my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Athlon X4 880K 4.0GHz Socket FM2+



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Athlon X4 880K 4.0GHz Socket FM2+

Testseek.com have collected 50 expert reviews of the AMD Athlon X4 880K 4.0GHz Socket FM2+ and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Athlon X4 880K 4.0GHz Socket FM2+.
 
(79%)
50 Reviews
Users
(88%)
30 Reviews
79 0 100 50

 

Reviews

page 3 of 5
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2016-06-28, Author: Axe斧娃 , review by: expreview.com

  • 总得来说,因为这几年的市场表现的亏损让红色巨头的研发路程走了不少弯路,所以AMD还是吃了一些微架构上的亏,好在凭借更多的物理核心和更有优势的多核性能还是挽回了一些差距,所以AMD如果想要快点翻身的话,Zen架构注定是AMD最重要的机会了,好在根据我们之前的报道,AMD将会放弃模块化架构的指导思想,转而支持SMT多线程。此外虽然字面上看Athlon X4 880K并没有什么特别的亮点,但是别忘了这是一块不锁频的处理器,在超频上有着额外的性能红利,运用得当的话可以进一步榨干性能。此外相比Intel,AMD于今...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-06-23, Author: 组装电脑网 , review by: lotpc.com

  • Abstract:  AMD近期不断发布最新处理器,比如旗舰级 A10-7890K 和八核FX-8370等,通过新品我们不难发现,AMD处理器依然主打高性价比,唯一就是在架构、功耗、DDR4内存支持方面欠缺。那么AMD速龙II 880k性能怎么样?下面装机之家为大家带来AMD 880k评测,作为一款新款速龙系列的桌面处理器,跟着小编一起来看看AMD四核880k带来的性能表现吧!首先来说说这款CPU参数方面,AMD速龙四核880K基于Godavari核心设计,原生四核心四线程,默认主频为4.0GHz,支持智能超频至4.2GHz,...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-06-22, Author: 赵剑楠 , review by: zol.com.cn

  • 向作者提问标签:CPU四核AMDcpu性能 cpu.zol.com.cn true 中关村在线 report 753   AMD近几个月不断推出高性能新品处理器,包括之前我们也为大家带来的AMD A10-7890K及AMD FX-8370的评测。从之前的几款新品中不难发现,AMD的处理器相比Intel产品在性价比方面更具优势。本次我们即将进行评测的处理器,是AMD速龙系列的新品——AMD速龙四核8...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-06-21, review by: pcworld.bg

  • Процесорът AMD Athlon X4 880k и модификациите на AMD Wraith Cooler не са никак лоши решения, но като че са малко закъснели - особено при положение, че новата CPU архитектура AMD Zen вече чука на вратата...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-06-13, Author: Rafael , review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • Our feel from the beginning was that the Athlon X4 880K was actually an A10-7870K with the integrated video disabled and 100 MHz more clock. Our tests were consistent with that: the Athlon X4 880K performed barely better than the A10-7870K, but the differ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2016-06-10, Author: Renissen2 , review by: hwt.dk

  • Samlet set er jeg meget tilfreds med denne lille Athlon X4 CPU som spiller fint med sine kræfter i forhold til AMD's A10-7860K APU. Manglen på L3 Cache gør at denne CPU ikke spiller lige så vildt som f.eks. en FX CPU, men det har den nu heller aldrig vær...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(75%)
 
  Published: 2016-05-26, Author: Сергей , review by: ferra.ru

  • Высокая тактовая частота, Разблокированный множитель. Разблокированный множитель. Разблокированный множитель, Низкое энергопотребление, Хороший разгонный потенциал. Низкое энергопотребление, Хороший разгонный потенциал
  • Разгонный потенциал хотелось бы повыше. Не обнаружено

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2016-05-26, Author: Jan , review by: ddworld.cz

  • Jak jste asi pochopili, tento přehled je udělaný hlavně s ohledem na příchod nových CPU, tak abychom si je rovnou zařadili a byli na ně v redakci připraveni. První novinky už testujeme, takže brzy budeme mít první recenzi jedné z nich. Přehled je ale jina...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2016-05-23, Author: Volker , review by: computerbase.de

  • Abstract:  AMD ist mit vielen Zielen in das Jahr 2016 gestartet: Den Beginn machte die Ankündigung der Polaris -Architektur für Grafikkarten, es folgte – angeführt vom neuen Wraith-Kühlern – eine ganze Familie an neuen Boxed-Kühlern. Es folgten neue APUs und der Ath...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-05-23, Author: Javier , review by: geeknetic.es

  • Este procesador es una buena opción para los que saben lo que necesitan en cada momento o para los que tienen un presupuesto ajustado y quieren una CPU solvente pero no pagar de más por tener una gráfica integrada que no van a necesitar. Por la diferencia...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 3 of 5 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×