my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 276 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 80%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Most Awarded April 2017
April 2017
 
(80%)
276 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
80 0 100 276

 

Reviews

page 18 of 28
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-04-20, Author: 김영우 , review by: donga.com

  • Abstract:  IT동아 김영우 기자] 거의 10여년 이상 PC용 CPU 시장에서 '추운 겨울'을 보내던 AMD에 드디어 봄인 온 것 같다. 지난 3월 첫 출시된 신제품인 '라이젠 7(Ryzen 7)' 덕분이다. 고급형 CPU 시장을 거의 독점하다시피 했던 인텔의 코어 i7의 경쟁제품으로 개발된 이 제품은, 우수한 성능을 발휘하면서 상대적으로 저렴한 가격을 내세워 많은 주목을 받았다.하지만 고급형 CPU 시장은 상징적인 의미가 크지만, 시장 자체의 볼륨은 그다지 크지...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-19, Author: Kevin , review by: Bjorn3d.com

  • The new AMD RYZEN CPU series has proven to be a huge breakthrough for AMD and is the first time in a long while that they have been able to put up a good hard fight with what Intel has to offer. In our tests, the RYZEN 1500X really proved just how compete...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(89%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-19, review by: ht4u.net

  • Etwas frustriert waren wir schon, als wir festestellen mussten, dass unsere bisher aufgezeichneten und selbst die kurz zuvor aufgenommenen Benchmarks auf Ryzen mit X370-Chipsatz unbrauchbar waren und komplett auf neuem Mainboard und aktueller BIOS-Version...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-18, review by: tweaktown.com

  • The Ryzen 5 CPUs are pretty much what we expected; slight enhancements in software/microcode with similar multi-core performance that scales with core count and frequency compared to Ryzen 7. At similar price points to Intel's offerings, the multi-threade...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(92%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-18, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • Abstract:  4月11日AMD 锐龙5 1500X与1600X正式解禁发售,而且一次带来四款产品,两款六核和两款四核,分别对应i7和i5,依旧有着超高性价比的他们受到了主流玩家的关注。现在不少评测文章出来后,大家对其印象非常深刻。下面我给大家带来他们两者的开箱对比,我们一起来看看这两颗处理器在包装与外观上有没有什么不同的地方。AMD 锐龙5 1500X处理器包含了一个Wraith Spire,因此他的外包装比AMD 锐龙5 1600X处理器要大了不少。而AMD 锐龙5 1600X处理器的盒子较小,里面只包含有一...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-17, Author: Miguel , review by: hardzone.es

  • Abstract:  Damos por cerrado el análisis de Ryzen 7 con los procesadores 1700, 1700X y 1800X y sin tiempo para entrar con otro hardware prolongamos nuestros análisis sobre la nueva arquitectura ZEN de AMD. Esta vez es el turno de Ryzen 5 que compite directamente co...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-14, Author: Nathan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • The AMD Ryzen 5 1500X at $189.00 shipped is a nice quad-core that we were able to easily overclock up to 4.2GHz with no issues at all. The performance of the AMD Ryzen 5 1500X overclocked up to 4.2GHz was pretty damn good, but it wasn't able to catch up t...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-04-14, Author: Karim , review by: pc-max.de

  • Nach nun mehr als einem Monat seit der Einführung von Ryzen legt AMD seine Mittelklasse-Modelle nach. Es war zunächst fraglich, ob der 1400 und 1500X (4 Kerne/8 Threads) sowie der 1600 und 1600X (6 Kerne/12 Threads) ebenso konkurrenzfähig sind wie die Ryz...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-04-14, Author: Daniele , review by: everyeye.it

  • Ryzen 5 1500X è un processore che da un lato fa molto bene, mentre dall'altro un po' meno: esso, costando di fatto la metà di un Core i7-7700K, agguanta quasi quest'ultimo quando si parla di potenza computazionale nuda e cruda, ma se si va sull'ambito gam...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-13, Author: Dave , review by: pcgamesn.com

  • After the highs of the Ryzen 5 1600X its quad-core sibling feels like a bit of a disappointment. I'm still trying to figure out what it's really for. At just under $200 it's simply priced too close to the $219 (£220) hexcore 1600. That's a six-core, 12-th...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(50%)
    page 18 of 28 « Previous   1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ... 28   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×