my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 348 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice April 2017
April 2017
 
(88%)
348 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
88 0 100 348

 

Reviews

page 21 of 35
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-04-22, Author: Chief , review by: lowyat.net

  • The Ryzen 5 1600X proves that AMD once again has a highly competitive product on its hands, even in the mid-range segment. While the chip might trail behind Intel's offering in terms of gaming, the Ryzen 5 1600X excels in many other tasks – providing bett...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-21, Author: Тест , review by: occlub.ru

  • Ну а теперь подытожим. Кто бы что ни говорил, но для игр на данный момент предпочтительнее будет i5. Ну он реально в играх лучше, и пусть на графиках это не совсем четко видно, но Ryzen тащит только в которых играх, где хорошо развита многопоточность. Но...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-04-20, Author: 김영우 , review by: donga.com

  • Abstract:  IT동아 김영우 기자] 거의 10여년 이상 PC용 CPU 시장에서 '추운 겨울'을 보내던 AMD에 드디어 봄인 온 것 같다. 지난 3월 첫 출시된 신제품인 '라이젠 7(Ryzen 7)' 덕분이다. 고급형 CPU 시장을 거의 독점하다시피 했던 인텔의 코어 i7의 경쟁제품으로 개발된 이 제품은, 우수한 성능을 발휘하면서 상대적으로 저렴한 가격을 내세워 많은 주목을 받았다.하지만 고급형 CPU 시장은 상징적인 의미가 크지만, 시장 자체의 볼륨은 그다지 크지...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-19, review by: ht4u.net

  • Etwas frustriert waren wir schon, als wir festestellen mussten, dass unsere bisher aufgezeichneten und selbst die kurz zuvor aufgenommenen Benchmarks auf Ryzen mit X370-Chipsatz unbrauchbar waren und komplett auf neuem Mainboard und aktueller BIOS-Version...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-18, review by: tweaktown.com

  • The Ryzen 5 CPUs are pretty much what we expected; slight enhancements in software/microcode with similar multi-core performance that scales with core count and frequency compared to Ryzen 7. At similar price points to Intel's offerings, the multi-threade...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(92%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-18, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • Abstract:  4月11日AMD 锐龙5 1500X与1600X正式解禁发售,而且一次带来四款产品,两款六核和两款四核,分别对应i7和i5,依旧有着超高性价比的他们受到了主流玩家的关注。现在不少评测文章出来后,大家对其印象非常深刻。下面我给大家带来他们两者的开箱对比,我们一起来看看这两颗处理器在包装与外观上有没有什么不同的地方。AMD 锐龙5 1500X处理器包含了一个Wraith Spire,因此他的外包装比AMD 锐龙5 1600X处理器要大了不少。而AMD 锐龙5 1600X处理器的盒子较小,里面只包含有一...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-18, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • Abstract:  在高性能处理器领域沉寂整整十年之后,AMD是彻底爆发了。在万众期待中,AMD终于拿出了全新的Zen架构,竟然实现了相比于上代产品多达52%的理论性能提升,实现了一个几乎不可能的奇迹。首发的锐龙Ryzen 7系列高端产品也光芒四射,凭借14nm工艺、8核心16线程、65-95W热设计功耗、全面开放超频、SenseMI智能管理技术、全新300系列芯片组,成功实现了挑战Intel发烧平台的夙愿,多线程性能尤其威猛,更关键的是价格却便宜得多!那个有战斗力的AMD,终于又回来了!锐龙7当然只是个...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-17, Author: Miguel , review by: hardzone.es

  • Abstract:  Damos por cerrado el análisis de Ryzen 7 con los procesadores 1700, 1700X y 1800X y sin tiempo para entrar con otro hardware prolongamos nuestros análisis sobre la nueva arquitectura ZEN de AMD. Esta vez es el turno de Ryzen 5 que compite directamente co...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-17, Author: Marcin , review by: benchmark.pl

  • Abstract:  Przedstawiamy zestawienie Top 10 procesorów znajdujących się w przedziale cenowym około 1000 - 1500 zł. W tym segmencie debiutują nowe modele AMD Ryzen - jeden z rodziny 7 oraz dwa z rodziny 5. Można tu również znaleźć wydajne modele Core i7 i najwydajnie...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(82%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-17, Author: 佚名 , review by: jb51.net

  • Abstract:  对于AMD Ryzen的测试又有了新的格局,这一次还是针对此前颇多争议的内存表现。据德媒的对比数据, AMD Ryzen在同频下对于双面内存支持较好,同是单面内存的话,高频低时序的表现更好 。测试成绩主要针对游戏表现,可以看到,搭配同频同时序的DDR4-2667内存条,双面的成绩普遍比单面高,比如《F1 2016》提升多达7帧。而同是单面内存,DDR4-3200(CL 14-14-14-34)比DDR4-2667(CL 16-16-16-36)也要明显好出不少。不过,随着技术的进步...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 21 of 35 « Previous   1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 35   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×