my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 348 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice April 2017
April 2017
 
(88%)
348 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
88 0 100 348

 

Reviews

page 9 of 35
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Guillaume , review by: hardware.fr

  • Abstract:  Sandy Bridge-E (2011, 32nm) Carte mère Asus P9X79 (4 canaux DDR3, PCI Express 3.0, SATA 6 Gb/s) Core i7-3970X Core i7-3930K LGA 1366: Bloomfield/Gulftown (2008/2010, 45/32nm) Carte mère Intel DX58SO (3 canaux DDR3, PCI Express 2.0, SATA 3 Gb...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Tomasz , review by: ithardware.pl

  • Kolejną interesującą kwestią jest wpływ zastosowanej płyty głównej na osiągi jednostek Pinnacle Ridge. Tak jak to wcześniej zakomunikowałem, dodatkowa funkcjonalność Turbo (Precision Boost Overdrive) dostępna jest wyłącznie w połączeniu z konstrukcjami ba...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Arkadiusz , review by: komputerswiat.pl

  • Oczywiste jest, że Ryzen 7 2700X i Ryzen 5 2600X nie wnoszą na rynek tak dużo, jak wcześniejsze modele. Są one zwyczajnie usprawnionymi odpowiednikami procesorów Ryzen 1. generacji. Wyższe częstotliwości taktowania, niższy proces technologiczny pozwoliły...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-19, Author: coolaler , review by: coolaler.com

  • Abstract:  AMD Ryzen 7 2700X、Ryzen 5 2600X曼谷技術研討會直擊及在三大板廠效能實測加對8700K、8600K性價比探討 前言: 早在年初的 CES展場 AMD就已經預告 AMD的第一個 12nm工藝,代號為 Pinnacle Ridge的第 2代 Ryzen桌上型處理器將於 2018年 4月上市 , 滄者也事先 取得了盒裝版 Ryzen 7 2700X及 Ryzen 5 2600X處理器及相關周邊元件並完成測試於今天奉上,歡迎大家來看 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X、Ryzen 5...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-13, Author: Jeff , review by: Techreport.com

  • Abstract:  The leaks have been flying hard and fast for weeks, but this morning, AMD is officially taking the wraps off its second-generation Ryzen CPUs. Four new chips have been waiting in the wings, and they'll be available for pre-order around the world starting...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-03, Author: Reinoud , review by: hardware.info

  • ConclusieWelke processor nu de meeste bang voor je buck biedt, varieert per prijspunt. Wie een heel klein budget heeft, kan naar onze mening het beste een Intel Pentium G4560 proberen te vinden, wat gezien de beschikbaarheid een minder grote uitdaging is...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-04-02, Author: Bình , review by: topnewreview.com

  • The six-core design makes this an appealing choice in some circumstances, but this is not for gamers (yet).Rating 4/58 Total ScoreAMD Ryzen 5 1600X ReviewThe six-core design makes this an appealing choice in some circumstances, but this is not for gamers...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2018-03-31, review by: overclockingmadeinfrance.com

  • Grosses nouveautés architecturales côté rouge, Ecrase la concurrence en archivage et création 3D, Rapport Perf/prix en applicatif EXTREMEMENT intéressant, Soudure en indium températures polaires, Ecrase les Quad Core Intel en streaming, Ressenti très f
  • …Mais pas aussi bon que le Ryzen 7 1700, Absence d'iGPU, on aurait préféré un Wraith Spire, Performances en retrait dans certains jeux, Variabilité pas exceptionnelle dans certains cas @Stock, Un bon cran endessous des Ryzen 7 en streaming
  • Il s'agit maintenant de conclure sur ces Ryzen 5 1600 et Ryzen 5 1600X. Comme nous l'avions dit dans le test du Ryzen 7 1800X, cette architecture Zen est une refonte complète et profite des derniers raffinements. AMD a fait l'impasse sur la carte graphi...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-03-30, review by: tomshw.it

  • Ridurre il nostro test a un singolo consiglio generico è quasi impossibile, specie dati i prezzi delle schede video sinora. Possiamo però identificare alcune delle tendenze più evidenti.Gli FPS tendono a preferire frequenze elevate e schede video veloci...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-03-27, Author: 晓龙 , review by: lotpc.com

  • 很显然,如果是对于追求性价比或者性能的用户来说,R5 1600X相比i5 8600K更为值得推荐,花同样的钱,能够带来更好的游戏体验,这才是DIY灵活装机的意义所在。当然,Intel酷睿i5 8600K平台有单核与核显优势,如果不打算上独立显卡,i5 8600K具备更好的过渡,另外Intel积累了长期的品牌优势,对于部分不是那么注重性价比的用户来说,Intel平台依然完全够用。至于如何选,就看大家的需求与喜好了。...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 9 of 35 « Previous   1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 35   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×