my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 3.6GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 3.6GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 317 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 90%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice July 2019
July 2019
 
(90%)
317 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
90 0 100 317

 

Reviews

page 28 of 32
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2019-07-07, review by: gamestar.de

  • Abstract:  Mit dem Ryzen 9 3900X und dem Ryzen 7 3700X testen wir AMDs erste Prozessoren der neuen und mittlerweile dritten Ryzen-Generation.Dank teils deutlich überarbeiteter Zen 2-Architektur und der Fertigung im 7-nm-Verfahren will AMD Konkurrent Intel sowohl in...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(97%)
 
  Published: 2019-07-07, Author: Ingolf , review by: computerbild.de

  • Sehr hohes Arbeitstempo, Sehr hohes Spieletempo mit separater Grafikkarte
  • Etwas hoher Stromverbrauch, Kein integrierter Grafikchip
  • Die gebotene Leistung überraschte im Test: Dass der Ryzen 7 3700X sogar Intels Core i9-9900K schlägt, hatten die Tester nicht erwartet. Aber nicht alles überzeugte vollends: So muss AMD beim Stromverbrauch nachbessern. Denn die Intel-Konkurrenz arbeitet t...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2019-07-07, review by: tweaktown.com

  • Right of ReplyWe at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.Relat...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2019-07-07, Author: Tarinder , review by: HEXUS.net

  • Improved IPC, Massive multi-core performance, Continues AM4 support, Blurs the lines between gaming and HEDT, Very good on power, Wide choice of X570 boards
  • Don't overclock fantastically
  • AMD impressed the technology world when it debuted the Zen CPU architecture a couple of years ago. Immediately competitive in multi-threaded applications and reasonable at gaming, executives were bombastic about future Zen designs improving upon the muscu...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2019-07-07, Author: Luke , review by: kitguru.net

  • Superb productivity performance in multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads, Excellent value compared to Intel competitors, Manageable power consumption with excellent efficiency values, Precision Boost 2 algorithm works very well, Strong high-speed m
  • Gaming performance is still slower than Intel Coffee Lake at the ultra-high-end, Platform cost is high due to expensive X570 motherboards, Maximum frequency capability is limited compared to Intel, even when overclocking
  • AMD's Zen 2 architecture in the Ryzen 3000 CPUs has delivered its side of the deal and the ability to squeeze twelve cores into a 105W package, thanks to smart design and the 7nm TSMC FinFET process, makes the Ryzen 9 3900X a success. The new AM4 flagship...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2019-07-07, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com

  • I'm torn on which CPU is the best deal here. The Ryzen 7 3700X is the best all round for gaming I would think. It doesn't run as hot, and it uses less power. However, 8 cores is more than enough for 99% of the PC gamers out there, and the performance and...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2019-07-07, Author: Mike , review by: hardwareheaven.com

  • Abstract:  It's an exciting time for AMD, too. The red team has been on a roll with its CPUs since the first generation of Ryzen arrived back in 2017. Now we're two ranges down, and the firm is promising big changes – and big competition for market leader Intel.So...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-07-07, review by: vortez.net

  • Clear IPC advancement over Zen+, Reasonably priced, Vastly better memory performance, Decent overclocking potential, 65W TDP ensures cooling isn't a huge task
  • High power draw at idle
  • A relative weakpoint of the Ryzen series so far as been memory performance. Latency and bandwidth has always lagged behind its Intel counterparts, however, in the latest series AMD seems to have come on leaps and bounds, reducing its memory latency to les...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2019-07-07, Author: Antony , review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • If you're toting a powerful GPU and are aiming for super-high frame rates to drive your high refresh rate monitor, then there are still some instances were Intel is a tad better. Dota 2 saw marginal gains over AMD, and as we suspected, the higher frequenc...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2019-07-07, Author: Iván , review by: noticias3d.com

  • Abstract:  Hará poco más de un año que AMD nos presentaba los Ryzen 2, segunda iteración de una gama de procesadores que dieron el campanazo, situando a AMD, por primera vez en mucho tiempo, como verdadera competidora de Intel. Con los Ryzen de la serie 2000, AMD me...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 28 of 32 « Previous   1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×