my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4

Testseek.com have collected 144 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4 and the average rating is 92%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4.
Award: Editor’s Choice August 2018
August 2018
 
(92%)
144 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
92 0 100 144

 

Reviews

page 11 of 15
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-08-13, Author: Igor , review by: tomshw.de

  • Ob man für solche sehr ausgefallenen CPUs einen expliziten Kauftipp vergeben kann oder muss, das war natürlich Gegenstand längerer Überlegungen, aber ich habe mich am Schluss dann doch anders entschieden. Da diese beiden Boliden eher nichts für die Masse...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-08-13, Author: Michael , review by: hardwarecanucks.com

  • About a year ago during the launch of Threadripper I was in the process of being impressed yet again by how far AMD had come with the Zen architecture. Before it, there were unfulfilled expectations, a successive line of disappointing launches and a real...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-08-13, review by: gamestar.de

  • hohe Spieleleistung, extrem hohe Anwendungsleistung, sehr gut für das Streaming geeignet, sechzehn Kerne, virtuelle Kernverdoppelung, Quad-Channel-Unterstützung, 64 PCI-Express-Lanes, hohe Taktraten für eine CPU mit 16 Kernen, freier Multiplikator und hil
  • Art des Speicherzugriffs und die hohe Kernzahl können in Spielen zu Problemen oder Leistungseinbußen führen, aktuelle Intel-CPUs in Spielen (noch) meist etwas flotter
  • Nils Raettig: Im Test des Ryzen Threadripper 2950X bestätigen sich weitgehend die Ergebnisse, die wir bereits von seinem Vorgänger 1950X kennen: Wer primär mit seinem PC spielt, der braucht keine 16 Kerne. Kommt es dagegen auch auf eine möglichst hohe Anw...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(95%)
 
  Published: 2018-08-13, review by: tweaktown.com

  • The performance of the 2990WX is interesting, at some points it's extremely impressive, and at other points, it's less impressive. That is basically because of the way the dies are connected, which results in long pathways to certain cores/dies. In applic...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(93%)
 
  Published: 2018-08-13, Author: Gordon , review by: pcworld.co.nz

  • Abstract:  Stop, AMD. You had us at 32-core, 64-thread Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX consumer CPU.You didn't have to make it better by saying this weapon of thread destruction could be ours for $1,799 (available on Newegg Remove non-product link or Amazon )—just $76 mor...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-08-13, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com

  • Honestly, most home users would do well to stick with Ryzen Gen 2 CPUs, such as the fantastic 2700X. For rendering and gaming, it's a beast of a CPU. However, if time is money, then cutting those rendering times down is important. The 2950X monsters the c...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-08-13, Author: Antony , review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • Threadripper 2990WX:To start with then, let's talk about the 2990WX. There are clearly some concerning areas in our benchmark results, but it's important to realise what kind of CPU we're dealing with here, as plenty of us have likely got caught up on the...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-08-13, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Unprecedented 32-core configuration, Unlocked multiplier for overclocking, Reasonable price per core, Indium solder between heat spreader and dies, Solid multi-threaded performance in some apps
  • Poor scaling in some workloads, Expensive platform
  • Threadripper 2990WX barrels onto the high-end desktop scene with 32 cores and 64 threads, wowing enthusiasts accustomed to four- and eight-core processors. But the unique design has its caveats. You need to have specific workloads in mind able to exploit...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-08-13, Author: Andrew , review by: techteamgb.co.uk

  • Abstract:  AMD has been killing it in the CPU game since they launched Ryzen last year. The 1800X – and the rest – did an amazing job of bringing competition back on the consumer level, then a few months later they launched their Threadripper series of chips which i...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2018-08-13, review by: es.gizmodo.com

  • Abstract:  Y en ese momento huyeron y se alejaron de mi.Después de unos meses muy malos para Intel y muy buenos para AMD, parecía terriblemente confuso que… AdvertisementPara la mayoría de las personas, solo dos cosas importan cuando se trata de considerar un proces...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 11 of 15 « Previous   1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×