Testseek.com have collected 89 expert reviews of the AMD Athlon 2 X4 620 2.6GHz Socket AM3 and the average rating is 86%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Athlon 2 X4 620 2.6GHz Socket AM3.
September 2009
(86%)
89 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
86010089
Reviews
page 4 of 9
Order by:
Score
Published: 2009-10-19, Author: Brian , review by: icrontic.com
Do we need processors that cost over $500 nowadays? To be perfectly honest, most people don’t. The most demanding task average consumers can throw at a computer is A/V content: They have 1080p AVC-HD video cameras, they have webcams, they have simple ...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2009-10-19, Author: Andrea , review by: tomshw.it
L'Athlon II X2 a 45 nm è stato il primo prodotto di fascia entry level a trarre vantaggio dell'architettura Phenom. Gli Athlon II X3 e X4 completano l'offerta di processori multi-core AMD di fascia bassa. Al momento, i modelli a disposizi...
Cheap, Stable performance, 95W , low power consumer
Overclocking
This is a pretty decent CPU, for 90$ you get alot of performance especially if you overclock the CPU a little bit. It performs better than 905e in stock performance and cost almost half the price. This CPU should do well in HTPC setups and even in nor...
Lågt pris, Stabil prestanda, 95W, relativt låg strömförbrukning,
Överklockning
Detta är en ganska skaplig CPU, för 610 SEK (90 USD) får du mycket prestanda, speciellt om du överklockar processorn lite. Den presterar bättre än en fabriksinställd 905e och kostar nästan halva priset. Denna proces...
Before getting into our overall conclusions, I must give kudos to AMD for being the first company out the door with a sub-$100 quad-core processor. Any way you look at it, reaching this point is impressive, because once again, quad-cores haven't even ...
Na maioria dos cenários o Athlon II X4 620 foi mais rápido do que o micro baseado na plataforma Intel com mesma faixa de preço (Pentium E6300). A única exceção importante foi no Photoshop CS4, onde o Pentium E6300 foi 24% mais rápido do que o Athlon II...
Abstract: AMD continue to drive us mad with their product names (there is no reason why this chip could not be called the Phenom 2 X4 620) but as far as the product itself goes it is hard not to be impressed.
In most scenarios Athlon II X4 620 was faster than an Intel-based system on the same price range (Pentium E6300). The only important exception was on Photoshop CS4, where Pentium E6300 was 24% faster than Athlon II X4 620, and file compression with Wi...
Great pricing, Good performance, Low power consumption and heat, Good overclocking and great underclocking potential, Same list of technology support as Phenoms, Socket AM2/DDR2 compatibility
Lower gaming performance, Not the best choice for die hard overclockers, High stock voltage
Even if AMD is not leading the market in terms of pure brute performance, it still finds categories where it can brand the product with "world's first". This time, it's the world's first and still only quad-core processor with a price under $1...
