my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 2.6GHz Socket AM2



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 2.6GHz Socket AM2

Testseek.com have collected 28 expert reviews of the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 2.6GHz Socket AM2 and the average rating is 76%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 2.6GHz Socket AM2.
 
(76%)
28 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
76 0 100 28

 

Reviews

page 2 of 3
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2006-07-19, Author: Nathan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • Our testing showed that when gaming at high resolutions the limiting factor is not the processor, but is actually the graphics card. This was shown to be true in three out of the six games that we benchmarked. We used the ATI Radeon X1900XTX graphics...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-07-01, review by: Computerpoweruser.com

  • Abstract:  Athlon 64 X2 5000+ $696 AMD (408) 749-4000 www.amd.com 3.5 CPUs Specs: Dual-core; 2.6GHz; 512KB L2 cache x2; 128KB L1 cache x2; 128-bit DDR-2 memory controller (dual-channel); 2GHz HyperTransport link; Socket AM2; 89W max thermal power; 90nm process Wh...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-06-28, review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • As an upgrade, the Athlon processors dont yet make sense. The chips themselves are expensive, and by the time youve factored in a motherboard and some extra DDR2 memory you could be looking at paying twice as much – especially if youre looking to b...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2006-06-27, review by: SweClockers.com

  • Bra minnesprestanda, I regel en smärre prestandahöjning jämfört med sockel 939system, Virtualiseringstekniken Pacifica, Bra överklockningsresultat
  • Minnesdividern är inte exakt vilket resulterade i lite lägre minnesfrekvens (med inställningen DDR2 800), Inte prisvärd
  • Eftersom många redan från början gjorde det klart att skillnaden skulle bli liten mellan AM2- och sockel 939-baserade system kom resultaten i testen inte som någon överraskning. Vi kan se en mindre prestandaökning i de flesta program och spel. Även vi...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-06-02, Author: Rich , review by: cnet.com

  • Faster than Intels current fastest, more expensive desktop CPU; beats even AMDs more expensive FX-60 chips on some tests.
  • Requires new motherboard and memory; Intels new, potentially faster CPUs are right around the corner.
  • AMDs new high-end dual-core CPU offers plenty of bang for the buck, outpacing Intels Pentium 965 Extreme Edition, which costs $200 more. Sounds like a good deal, but wait to see what Intels next-gen Core 2 Duo chips have to offer when they debut lat...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2006-05-25, review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • Abstract:  Our review of Athlon 64 5000+, one of the first AMD CPUs supporting DDR2 memories and based on the new AM2 socket. Check it out!

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-05-25, review by: techwarelabs.com

  • AMD has once again moved in the right direction with the release of AM2 with support for DDR2. While the performance gains are not as staggering as they were with the release of the Athlon, or the Athlon 64, they are still noticeable. Overall the conv...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-05-23, review by: nordichardware.se

  • Abstract:  När det gäller AMDs övergång från DDR1 till DDR2 visste vi alla att denna logiska fortsättning skulle komma förr eller senare. För nästan 2 år sedan började Intel tillkännage sin övergång till DDR2 och att PC3200 skulle bli den sista...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-05-23, review by: neoseeker.com

  • Ok, that was a lot of work - and a lot of fun. Clearly AMD has delivered a very viable processor with the AM2 launch. The on-board DDR2 memory controller provides extremely low DDR2 latency that cannot be matched even by the excellent Intel 975X chips...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-05-23, review by: MotherBoards.org

  • This round shows the gap between Intel and AMD taking a wider gap in favor of AMD for the first time; to be candid the FX62 was a smoking gun as an out of box product. AMD has really made advancements the past year with new faster CPUs and better chips...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 2 of 3 « Previous   1 2 3   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×