my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD FX-4300 3.8Ghz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-4300 3.8Ghz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 71 expert reviews of the AMD FX-4300 3.8Ghz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 61%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-4300 3.8Ghz Socket AM3 Plus.
 
(61%)
71 Reviews
Users
(90%)
868 Reviews
61 0 100 71

 

Reviews

page 7 of 8
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-12-04, review by: xbitlabs.com

  • Abstract:  The launch of Socket AM3+ processors with Piledriver microarchitecture inspired many AMD fans. However, until recently we only based our opinion on the results obtained from the top model in the new AMD FX family. Today we are going to make up for this omission and carry out a detailed performance analysis of all Vishera processors with eight, six and four cores....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-12-03, Author: Gavric , review by: fcenter.ru

  • Abstract:  В течение нескольких последних лет положение AMD на рынке десктопных процессоров планомерно ухудшалось. Сначала за неимением новых прогрессивных микроархитектур компании приходилось раз за разом сбрасывать цены на свои процессоры, и в итоге мы пришли к то...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-12-01, review by: Lesnumeriques.com

  • Performances dans les applications tirant parti de la présence de plusieurs cœurs, Fonction Turbo qui permet de limiter la casse sur les applications ne tirant pas parti de la présence de plusieurs cœurs, Les cartes mères AM+ d'ancienne génération sont co
  • Consommation électrique, Performances dans les applications ne tirant pas parti de la présence de plusieurs cœurs, Performances dans les jeux vidéo toujours en retrait par rapport à la concurrence
  • AMD réussit à augmenter les performances de ses processeurs haut de gamme, c’est un fait, surtout sur les applications multi-threadées. En revanche, les lacunes de la génération précédente sont toujours présentes et il serait temps que la société se pe...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2012-11-07, review by: presence-pc.com

  • Abstract:  Véritable cerveau de l’ordinateur, le processeur se doit d’être choisi avec le plus grand soin. En effet, si le nombre de fabricants de processeurs x86 grand public s’est réduit comme une peau de chagrin au fil des ans, la quantité de modèles différent...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-30, review by: hardwarecanucks.com

  • Abstract:  While the FX-8350 may have hogged the lion’s share of AMD’s Vishera launch coverage, a number of more affordable processors were introduced alongside it. The six core FX-6300 and quad core FX-4300 are both priced under $140 and should provide some re...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-25, Author: Hilbert , review by: guru3d.com

  • Abstract:  AMD FX 8350 - 8320 - 6300 and 4300 processors performance analyzedAMD released the FX series Vishera - Piledriver based processor. And though everybody has been focusing on that most high-end AMD FX 8350 processor, another three processors have been relea...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-23, Author: Anand , review by: anandtech.com

  • Abstract:  Last year's launch of AMD's FX processors was honestly disappointing. The Bulldozer CPU cores that were bundled into each Zambezi chip were hardly power efficient and in many areas couldn't significantly outperform AMD's previous generation platform. Look...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-23, Author: Koen , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  The first generation processors based on AMD's Bulldozer architecture did not meet expectations, so AMD is making a second attempt today, with FX 2.0 or Vishera. The Piledriver cores are a refinement and further development of Bulldozer, that are suppos...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-23, review by: hardware.info

  • De tijd dat AMD in het high-end segment kon concurreren met Intel is echt voorbij en daar brengen de nieuwe FX-processors ook geen verandering in. AMD kan echter een ander wapen inzetten: de prijs. Dat doet het met de nieuwe FX-processors zeer effectie...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-06, review by: pclab.pl

  • odblokowany mnożnik, duże możliwości podkręcania
  • gorsze od konkurencji ogólne osiągi (szczególnie w grach), duży pobór energii, wysoka cena, jak na wydajność, którą zapewnia (szczególnie w porównaniu z Phenomem II X4 965BE i FXem 6300)
  • Podobnie jak w przypadku poprzednich testów procesorów rozdzielamy podsumowanie na dwie części jedna dotyczy wydajności i opłacalności zakupu w ustawieniach domyślnych, w drugiej zaś oceniamy te same parametry, ale po podkręceniu.Analiza wydajności i opła...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 7 of 8 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×