my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD FX-8370E 3.3GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8370E 3.3GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 91 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8370E 3.3GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 76%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8370E 3.3GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
Award: Most Awarded October 2014
October 2014
 
(76%)
91 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
76 0 100 91

 

Reviews

page 6 of 10
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2014-09-29, review by: thg.ru

  • FX-8370E – неплохой CPU, и фактически он обеспечивает достойный уровень производительности в некоторых сценариях. Сравнение с его прямыми соперниками даёт понять, что мы имеем дело со старой архитектурой, которая также имеет слабые места. Единственный спо...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-09-29, Author: Emil , review by: SweClockers.com

  • Utrymme för överklockning, Godkänd prestanda med flera trådar, För FXserien lågt effektuttag
  • För hög prislapp, Tappar kraft med färre trådar, Effekthungrig, Ålderstigen plattform
  • Att AMD FX-8370E egentligen inte innebär några större nyheter kommer knappast oväntat. Processorn bygger i grunden på samma Piledriver-arkitektur och kisel som hängt med sedan lanseringen av FX-8350 för två år sedan, vilket innebär mer eller mindre föruts...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-09-29, Author: Igor , review by: tomshw.it

  • Abstract:  AMD ha recentemente presentato tre nuovi processori: FX-8370, FX-8370E e FX-8320E. In questo articolo diamo un'occhiata all'FX-8370E, una CPU quad-core Piledriver - per cui non ci soffermeremo sull'architettura - che opera di base a 3.3 GHz con TDP di 95...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-09-28, Author: Wade , review by: hitechlegion.com

  • Abstract:  In a sense the computer industry goes through these same type of cycles. Components get more powerful but also tend to get smaller. Once a certain point is reached with the reduction of size a bigger bump in performance can be made by increasing the size ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2014-09-23, Author: Leo , review by: kitguru.net

  • Compatible with existing AM3boards, Uses 30w less than previous version, Enough performance for mainstream users
  • Rapidly hits power limit, which disables the turbo boost, Hard to achieve the claimed 4.3GHz in regular use, in most cases it tops out at 3.6GHz, Uses Piledriver rather than Steamroller technology, Pulls almost 50% more wattage than equivalent Intel Core
  • When I started testing AMD's FX-8370E I had the horrible suspicion that it might be faulty as the clock speed started at 3.3GHz and didn't seem to increase with Turbo. This meant the performance was significantly lower than the 4.0GHz/4.2GHz FX-8350 – whi...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2014-09-23, Author: diola , review by: adrenaline.uol.com.br

  • Baixas temperaturas, Consumo caiu consideravelmente quando em uso contínuo devido seu TDP de 95W
  • Valor alto comparado a modelos concorrentes, Perde para o Core i5 4570 em diversos testes
  • O "novo" processador FX-8370E da AMD chega ao mercado trazendo como maior atrativo sobre as demais versões da linha FX seu TDP, consideravelmente abaixo dos demais. Para lançar o processador com esse TDP, 95W (ao contrário de 125W da versão normal), a emp...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(81%)
 
  Published: 2014-09-22, review by: tomshardware.com

  • Does the new FX-8370E represent a step forward for AMD's FX line of processors? Giving a clear answer is somewhat of a challenge. Our test sample performs about the same as its predecessors at similar clock rates, but draws less power doing so. However, i...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-09-22, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Does the new FX-8370E represent a step forward for AMD's FX line of processors? Giving a clear answer is somewhat of a challenge. Our test sample performs about the same as its predecessors at similar clock rates, but draws less power doing so. However, i...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-09-22, Author: Ryan , review by: eteknix.com

  • Reduced TDPs over 125W parts
  • Existing FX 8350 and FX 8320 parts are better value, Reduced power comes at a fairly significant performance hit in most applications, Nothing new has been presented,
  • PricingAMD's FX 8370E has an MSRP of $199.99. We found it at Amazon in the USA for $194.99 and at Newegg for $209.99, in the UK Overclockers are selling it for £145.99. A 3 year AMD warranty is provided.SummaryThe FX 8370E isn't a “new” CPU in the typical...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-09-16, Author: Paolo , review by: hwupgrade.it

  • Il debutto dei nuovi processori AMD della famiglia FX cambia solo in misura marginale quello che è l'attuale offerta del produttore americano per sistemi desktop di fascia medio alta basati su scheda video discreta. Da molti anni a questa parte questo è v...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 6 of 10 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×