my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Phenom 2 X6 1055T 2.8Ghz Socket AM3



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Phenom 2 X6 1055T 2.8Ghz Socket AM3

Testseek.com have collected 57 expert reviews of the AMD Phenom 2 X6 1055T 2.8Ghz Socket AM3 and the average rating is 86%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Phenom 2 X6 1055T 2.8Ghz Socket AM3.
Award: Most Awarded September 2010
September 2010
 
(86%)
57 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
86 0 100 57

 

Reviews

page 6 of 6
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2010-04-27, review by: anandtech.com

  • Abstract:  A very smart man once told me that absolute performance doesn’t matter, it’s performance at a given price point that makes a product successful. While AMD hasn’t held the absolute performance crown for several years now, that doesn’t mean the company’...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-04-27, review by: computerbase.de

  • Nachdem AMD das letzte Jahr dazu genutzt hat, den Rückstand auf den großen Konkurrenten Intel zu verkürzen, greift der Hersteller in diesem Jahr an. Mit den Phenom II X6 tummelt sich AMD im Schnitt auf Höhe der schnellen 4-Kern-Core-i7 auf Nehalem-Basi...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2010-04-26, review by: hardwarecanucks.com

  • Frankly, AMD have done an ACE job with these new processors. The results really do speak for themselves. In applications that utilize more than four threads, the new Phenom II X6 is generally a phenomenal performer, leaving the Phenom II X4's in the du...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2010-04-26, Author: Nathan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • Abstract:  One of the most impressive areas of the Phenom II X6 is the thermal performance of the processor. AMD has kept the TDP at 125W on these six-core processors and the thermals are impressive. With our XIGMATEK HDT-S1283 CPU cooler we were seeing 24C idle temperatures..

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-04-26, review by: xbitlabs.com

  • I believe no one will deny that Stars (K10.5) microarchitecture used in contemporary AMD processors has become pretty obsolete and is inferior to Nehalem microarchitecture in many aspects. However, it doesn’t mean that AMD can’t roll out up-to-date sol...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-04-26, review by: hardwareunboxed.com

  • Performance wise we were hoping to see a little more out of the new AMD Phenom II X6 processors. Although the Core i7 980 XE already proved that most applications and games are not ready for six dedicated cores, it was still for the most part faster th...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-04-19, review by: planet3dnow.de

  • Nachdem wir im letzten Jahr den Phenom II in diversesten Varianten begrüßen durften, hält heute eine weitere Ausbaustufe Einzug: Der AMD Phenom II X6 "Thuban". Ganze sechs Kerne, die im Normalfall mit bis zu 3,2 GHz takten (je nach Modell) und obendra...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 6 of 6 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×