my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Ryzen 5 2600X 4.2GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X 4.2GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 382 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X 4.2GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 5 2600X 4.2GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice April 2018
April 2018
 
(87%)
382 Reviews
Users
(98%)
19 Reviews
87 0 100 382

 

Reviews

page 25 of 39
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-05-03, Author: Friedrich , review by: channelpartner.de

  • hohe MulticoreLeistung, gute GamingLeistung, entsperrter Multiplikator, günstiger Preis
  • gestiegener Stromverbrauch
  • Der AMD Ryzen 5 2600X wirkt im Vergleich mit dem 1600X noch ausgereifter und bietet dank höherer Taktraten spürbar mehr Leistung – sowohl beim Gaming, als auch in Multimedia- und Computing-Anwendungen. Der direkte Konkurrent in Form des Intel Core i5-8600...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-05-03, review by: gamestar.de

  • sechs Kerne, virtuelle Kernverdoppelung, hohe Spieleleistung, hohe Anwendungsleistung, relativ niedrige Leistungsaufnahme unter Last, niedrige Temperaturen unter Last, hohe Taktraten, freier Multiplikator und hilfreiche Software für leichtes Übertakten
  • Zen-Architektur wird teils (noch) nicht optimal von Spielen und Anwendungen ausgelastet
  • Nils Raettig: Der Ryzen 5 2600X bestätigt im Test einerseits die guten Ergebnisse des Ryzen 7 2700X - und andererseits das, was bereits im alten Testsystem für den Vergleich zwischen dem Ryzen 7 1800X und dem Ryzen 5 1600X galt: In Spielen machen die beid...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(91%)
 
  Published: 2018-05-02, Author: Leo , review by: techporn.ph

  • PERFORMANCE, BUNDLE, THERMALS, PRICE
  • POWER
  • SummaryThe AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is a proper replacement for the Ryzen 5 1600X CPU. A 6-core and 12-thread CPU that retails for about $229, with a local landing price of ₱12,750. A good price point for an excellent product...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2018-05-01, review by: tweakers.net

  • Significante toename multi-core prestaties, deels door nieuw proces en deels door XFR2, Toename single core prestaties, Stuk krachtiger in multi-core (compute, creative) taken dan een i5, 1080p / super-high-fps game prestaties vanuit praktisch oogpunt con
  • Maximale FPS in lagere reso/setting games blijft nog altijd wat achter, AM4 platform is weliswaar meer volwassen, maar wees nog wel even alert met je geheugenkeuze. Je kan nog niet blind geheugen uit het schap trekken
  • Voor de uitgebreide conclusie over AMD Ryzen 2 als geheel verwijzen we naar de Deel één over de R7 2700X.Wat de Ryzen 5 2600X specifiek betreft: We zien dat AMD ook hier een leuke stap vooruit heeft gemaakt, zowel in single core prestaties, multi-core pre...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2018-05-01, review by: gizmodo.jp

  • ・初代よりレベルアップし、インテルに勝るとも劣らないレベルになりました。・特に強いのが、負荷の大きな動画のトランスコーディングや3Dレンダリング。・ゲームは依然インテルの勝ち。でもわかるかわからないかぐらいの僅差です。・初の商用12nmデスクトッププロセッサでもあります。・Spectreは10nmプロセッサの登場までお預け。・GPU非搭載。グラフィックスカードは自前です。Image: Alex Cranz(Gizmodo US)Alex Cranz - Gizmodo US (satomi)...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-29, review by: tomshw.it

  • Prestazioni decisamente superiori ai Ryzen di prima generazione, dissipatore in bundle, prestazioni di memoria e cache migliorate, retrocompatibilità con motherboard serie 300,
  • Non ci sono motherboard a basso costo basate su nuovi chipset della serie 400,
  • Ryzen 5 2600X non è impressionante come Ryzen 7 2700X, ma offre un solido mix di prestazioni e buon prezzo che ben si adatta a molti differenti carichi di lavoro. I professionisti potrebbero essere più interessati agli otto core del 2700X, mentre chi vuol...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2018-04-28, Author: Gian , review by: bitsandchips.it

  • possiamo affermare che oramai le soluzioni AMD ed Intel si equivalgono in ambito videoludico, e che un vantaggio per l'una o l'altra uArch la fanno soltanto i programmatori. Se il gioco viene programmato nella maniera più agnostica possibile, una CPU Ryz...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-27, Author: Nathan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X appears to be an enticing processors for those looking to spend around $230 on a desktop processor for a system build. The performance of the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X was able to top the Intel Core i7-8700K in a small number of tests and th...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-04-27, Author: Jeff , review by: Techreport.com

  • Abstract:  Finally. After an eventful week in the world of hardware benchmarking, I've wrapped up our gaming test results for AMD's second-generation Ryzen CPUs. We've taken some extra time to bench each Intel and AMD chip in our test suite with stock RAM as well as...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-27, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.com

  • Big boost over previous-gen Ryzen, Bundled cooler, Improved memory and cache performance, Backward compatibility with 300-series chipsets,
  • No value-oriented 400-series motherboards
  • AMD's Ryzen 5 2600X is faster than the previous-gen models in nearly every respect. The addition of lower cache and memory latencies, along with more sophisticated multi-core boosts, takes AMD's gaming performance to the next level. The extra threads...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 25 of 39 « Previous   1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ... 39   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×