my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4

Testseek.com have collected 220 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4.
Award: Editor’s Choice August 2017
August 2017
 
(88%)
220 Reviews
Users
(60%)
2 Reviews
88 0 100 220

 

Reviews

page 13 of 22
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-08-23, Author: 香香 , review by: lotpc.com

  • 2、游戏性能测试对比通过游戏测试对比,两者没有区别。对比总结:上图是Ryzen 1950X和1920X的区别,具体的选择,还要根据自己的实际情况,预算多的话,还是选择可玩性更高的Ryzen 1950X。其实Ryzen 1920X性能已经足够强大。...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-21, Author: 米田 , review by: 4gamer.net

  • 前述のとおり7900XではAVX-512が使われてしまうため,1950Xの7900Xに対するスコアはほとんど参考にならない。古典的なx86命令を使うMulti-Media Quad-int Native x1 ALUで,1950Xが約57%高いスコアを示し,またAVX-512を使用しない「Multi-Media Quad-float Native x2 FMA」で18%高いスコアを出しているのが見どころだろうか。対1800Xだと1950Xは総合スコアで約92%高いスコアを叩き出し,個別のテストでも78~1...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-20, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com

  • Blazes through workstation tasks with ease, Incredible multi-tasking potential, Competitive 4K gaming performance, Easy to overclock (albeit hard to keep cool), 64-PCIe lanes, Quad-channel memory support,
  • Poor gaming performance at lower resolutions, Requires a very powerful CPU cooler, Neutral, Some games and software still don’t know what to do with all those cores, “It’s not without its problems, but to see AMD not only competing but winning in workstat
  • PricingAll prices are correct as of 19/08/2017Currently, the AMD Threadripper 1950X is £989.99, not bad given the performance and price per core. Especially so compared to the Intel i9-7900X which is around the same price at £935.38. Dependant on what you...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-08-18, Author: Jim , review by: pcforalla.idg.se

  • Har du pengarna och behov av att köra multitrådade program eller flera krävande applikationer samtidigt är Threadripper 1950X ett utmärkt val. Men vill du bara ha en kraftfull processor för att spela de senaste spelen klarar du dig i stort sett lika bra med Ryzen 7...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-08-18, Author: Jeff , review by: Techreport.com

  • Before we issue a verdict on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Threadripper 1950X, it's time once more to condense our results using our famous value scatter plots. We take the geometric mean of all of our real-world test results and plot that figure agai...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-08-18, Author: 上方文Q , review by: mydrivers.com

  • Abstract:  AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper提供了最多16个核心32个线程,Intel Core i9也即将带来最多18个核心36个线程,对于内容创作、对多任务并行来说简直是天大的福音。但也不是所有应用都需要那么多核心线程,尤其是玩游戏,四核心配合适当频率其实就完全足够,多则反而经常无益,甚至太多核心反而会导致游戏性能下降,乃至无法运行。Intel Core i9-7900X就是反面例子 ,10核心20线程还有新架构,结果玩游戏反而还不如以前,帧率波动特别大。为此, AMD Ryzen ThreadRip...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-17, Author: Christoph , review by: gamezoom.net

  • 16 Kerne und 32 Threads, enorme Leistung, sehr gute Spieleleistung, gutes OC-Potenzial, moderne X399-Plattform, fairer Preis für 16 Kerne
  • hoher Idle-Stromverbrauch, Kompatibilitätsprobleme bei einigen Spielen (zu viele Threads)
  • Während der neue Intel Core i9-7900X für wenig Begeisterung innerhalb unserer Redaktion sorgen konnte, schaut es beim AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X anders aus. Das CPU-Flaggschiff von AMD macht schon beim Auspacken bzw. Montieren Spaß. Der fast schon gigan...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-08-17, review by: gamestar.de

  • hohe Spieleleistung, sehr hohe Anwendungsleistung, sehr gut für das Streaming geeignet, sechzehn Kerne, virtuelle Kernverdoppelung, Quad-Channel-Unterstützung, 64 PCI-Express-Lanes, recht hohe Taktraten für eine CPU mit 16 Kernen, freier Multiplikator und
  • aktuelle Intel-CPUs in Spielen (noch) meist etwas flotter, Art des Speicherzugriffs und die hohe Kernzahl können in Spielen zu Problemen oder Leistungseinbußen führen
  • Nils Raettig: Der Ryzen Threadripper 1950X mit 16 Kernen beweist im Test, dass AMDs Konzept der Kombination von Core Complexes auch beim Einsatz zweier Zeppelin-Dies gut funktioniert. In Spielen kann es durch die standardmäßig größeren Latenzen beim Speic...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(95%)
 
  Published: 2017-08-14, review by: computerworld.dk

  • Det samme gælder gaming.Med mindre du har brug for samtidig at kunne streame eller optage dine spil, får du mere gaming-lir i en Intel-processor, da de fleste spil ikke kan udnytte så mange kerner, og flere spil stadig er optimeret til Intel og ikke AMD.M...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-14, Author: 晓龙 , review by: lotpc.com

  • AMD使用的三星14nm LPP工艺能效比在多核心上更有优势,TR 1950X以180瓦功耗达到了16核3.7G的效能,在目前CPU制造工艺中可圈可点。Ryzen ThreadRipper处理器在多核心应用上确实有和intelCore i9掰腕子的能力,尤其是渲染类应用性能非常出色,高度并行计算中多核心能发挥等比率提升的优势,收益大于堆主频。通过利用Boost频率和XFR技术,ThreadRipper能在合理温度和功耗范围内对处理器加速,应付线程数比较少的工作任务。TR 1950X的定价仅相当于Intel...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 13 of 22 « Previous   1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 22   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×