my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Apple iPod Nano 7G 8GB / 16GB MD480/MKN52



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Apple iPod Nano 7G 8GB / 16GB MD480/MKN52

Testseek.com have collected 96 expert reviews of the Apple iPod Nano 7G 8GB / 16GB MD480/MKN52 and the average rating is 77%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Apple iPod Nano 7G 8GB / 16GB MD480/MKN52.
Award: Most Awarded September 2015
September 2015
 
(77%)
96 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
77 0 100 96

 

Reviews

page 8 of 10
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-10-19, Author: Nicolas , review by: igen.fr

  • Écran tactile plus confortable que l'ancien, Multitâche: musique, vidéos, photos, dictaphone, podomètre, Très efficace en lecture de musique
  • Trop cher par rapport à un iPod touch d'entrée de gamme, Écouteurs livrés sans commandes ni micro, Bouton d'accueil sous-utilisé, Bluetooth 4.0 sous-exploité
  • Cet iPod nano revu et corrigé, ou plutôt "rénanové" selon Apple, laisse un sentiment mitigé. D'un côté on a un très bon lecteur audio, plus que multimédia, sans doute le meilleur depuis quelques années chez Apple. Même si la molette reste un modèle d'ergo...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-19, Author: Campbell , review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Compact, smart design, Bluetooth 4.0 is useful
  • Missing features from previous nano, Screen isn't great for video
  • Apple's constantly-reinvented iPod nano gets a video-friendly screen and Bluetooth in its latest update. It's a user-friendly device as portable media players go, although it's missing a few features we liked on previous incarnations...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(75%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-19, Author: Brent , review by: gizmodo.in

  • Yes, but only if you dont have a smartphone, which is fewer and fewer people every day. The new Nano is the best MP3 player ever made, but its still not as good as a two-year-old mid-range smartphone. Truly. It cant stream music. Nike+ is fine, but wit...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-18, Author: Chris , review by: arstechnica.com

  • Solid design, Long-lasting battery, Larger screen is usable for video and better for photos
  • Too big to use as a watch replacement, Isn't actually a tiny iPod touch

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-18, review by: gadgetshow.channel5.com

  • Apple can never seem to make its mind up when it comes to the iPad nano. First it was long, then it was fat, then it was long again, then square, and now once again, it’s long. It was a smart choice though: the 5.4mm thin aluminium frame is as sturdy as it is beautiful.It’s an iPod nano, it’s an Apple device: you don’t need us to tell you by this point that it’s easy to use. Still, we’re happy to
  • Yes, the new iPod nano certainly is pretty. But it’s an iPod nano that plays video and connects to iTunes to sync all your media. In other words, it’s the same as it was in 2007. Minus the clickwheel. It’d be tempting to pass it off as “don’t fix what ain’t broke”, but this is Apple, and we’re not giving it a pass. Why not fix it? Wi-Fi for one, wouldn’t go amiss, for iTunes streaming or even - g
  • There’s no doubt that this iPod nano is the best one Apple’s created - and its existence next to the iPod shuffle is once again justified. But now that it resembles the iPhone more than ever, it raises the question: why doesn’t it do more? For work out...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-18, review by: theregister.co.uk

  • Like millions of other people I now use my smartphone as my primary portable media player, and this redesign isn’t going to reverse that trend. Even so, this is still a pretty smart update, and the Bluetooth capability and slimline design of the new N...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-17, Author: 編集部:風間雄介 , review by: phileweb.com

  • iPod nanoは、同じ会社が作っているプレーヤーだけあり、iPod touchと全体的な音の傾向は似ている。前回ウォークマンF800とiPod touchの比較を行ったが、両機ほど明確なキャラクターの差は無い。だが、聴き込むと両機の傾向の違いが浮かび上がってくる。まずはオスカー・ピーターソン・トリオ「You Look Good To Me」をiPod nanoで聴く。低域と高域がともに良く伸びるという印象で、トライアングルの音の、硬質な輝きが鮮烈だ。低域もグッと下まで沈み込み、かつ最低域付近の音の運び...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-16, review by: macworld.com.au

  • Larger screen makes Multi-Touch much more usable than with previous model; physical playback and Home buttons; more-iOS-like interface; regains video playback of older models; exceptionally thin and light
  • Only $50 less than entry-level iPod touch; screen isn't as good as those on other Apple devices; some users will miss previous model's built-in clip, $169 (16GB)

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-16, Author: Howard , review by: technoodling.net

  • The iPod Nano is a technical marvel. It's a media device and sports aid combo that's crammed inside a very small, sleek and attractive package. I still can't get over how I can fit the Nano inside my wallet's card slot. The asking price of Php 8,290 may s...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-12, Author: Tim , review by: engadget.com

  • Incredibly tiny and lightAluminum case feels solid, durable16:9 display and video playbackIntegrated Nike+ functionality
  • No cameraExpensive
  • Apple's latest iPod nano marks another re-design for the company's littlest player, but still it brings more to the table than any previous iteration....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(82%)
    page 8 of 10 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×