Testseek.com have collected 202 expert reviews of the Crucial / Micron 2.5 inch MX300 Series SATA600 and the average rating is 83%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Crucial / Micron 2.5 inch MX300 Series SATA600.
June 2016
(83%)
202 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(93%)
364 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
830100202
Reviews
page 20 of 21
Order by:
Score
Published: 2016-06-14, Author: Marc , review by: golem.de
Bedingt durch den ungewöhnlichen Speicherplatz von 750 GByte hat Crucials MX300 preislich keinen direkten Gegner: Typische 500-GByte-Angebote liegen bei 120 bis 150 Euro, doppelt so große 1-TByte-Modelle sind für 240 bis 280 Euro und höher verfügbar. Die...
Published: 2016-06-14, Author: Tony , review by: Techreport.com
As usual, let's condense the MX300's performance results into a single rating before we make any sweeping judgements. We distill the overall performance rating using an older SATA SSD as a baseline. To compare each drive, we then take the geometric mean...
Was this review helpful?
Award
-
Published: 2016-06-14, Author: Billy , review by: anandtech.com
To put this into perspective, under ordinary consumer and end-user/home workloads, the MX300 performs at its peak near the top of the TLC charts. On most tests we found the MX300 to be remarkably power efficient. Other things being equal, TLC is typically...
Toutes les pages Pour ne pas changer une équipe qui gagne, le Crucial MX300 aura su se montrer tout aussi convaincant que les générations précédentes de la marque. Ce nouveau support de stockage en profite pour passer à la mémoire NAND 3D qui permettra s...
Was this review helpful?
Award
-
Published: 2016-06-14, Author: mehrere , review by: computerbase.de
Niedriger Preis pro Gigabyte, Geringer Stromverbrauch im Leerlauf, Verschlüsselung
Leistung unterdurchschnittlich, Langsamer als Vorgänger
Die Crucial MX300 überrascht mit insgesamt niedriger Leistung, die deutlich hinter dem Vorgänger MX200 liegt. Getrübt wird das Gesamtbild vor allem von Unbeständigkeit bei bestimmten Aufgaben. Sporadisch auftretende Verzögerungen verschlechtern nicht...
With the release of the MX300 Crucial become the second manufacturer to bring an SSD to market with 3D NAND and overall it is a well-rounded product. We always like to see an SSD arrive with metal casing, it makes little difference to the day to day use...
Was this review helpful?
Award
(80%)
Published: 2016-06-14, Author: Simon , review by: kitguru.net
3D NAND, Strong write performance
4K read performance, Having to wait for smaller capacities to come to market.
Any new drive entering the 3D NAND SSD fray is going to be compared to Samsung's 3D V-NAND equipped drives. After all the Korean giants have had a huge head start when it comes to bringing 3D NAND drives to market and are currently already producing dense...
Good overall performance, Very low MSRP cost/GB (see below), Company extremely receptive and responsive to reviewer feedback
Latency Percentile revealed some inconsistencies at higher write QD and overall elevated read latencies when the drive has been written to capacity
For a budget SSD priced below $200, the 750GB Crucial MX300 delivers plenty of performance for the money. It represents a great showing of the first IMFT 3D NAND, coming in at a fraction of the cost/GB when compared with alternate 3D NAND solutions. The n...
The Crucial MX300 750GB show that the Crucial MX300 750GB SSD is one of the better TLC drives on the market that is targeted to mainstream customers. The new and improved Dynamic Write Acceleration appears to work well and was able to sustain performance...
