Testseek.com have collected 21 expert reviews of the G.Skill Phoenix Blade Series PCIe and the average rating is 93%. Scroll down and see all reviews for G.Skill Phoenix Blade Series PCIe.
(93%)
21 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Rendimiento excelente en todos los sentidos, Disipación pasiva especial que otorga unos excelentes acabados, Doble controladora y una extra para RAID, Interfaz PCIExpress x8 de alto rendimiento, Compatible con cajas de perfil bajo
El precio sigue siendo algo prohibitivo
Creo que ha quedado claro que el G.Skill Phoenix Blade es un dispositivo de altísimo rendimiento. No sólo porque comparándolo con soluciones similares barre cualquier resultado que podamos dar, sino porque se trata de un producto de última hornada donde e...
Published: 2014-12-18, Author: Kristian , review by: anandtech.com
The Phoenix Blade is a beast in performance. It's in the top two of all the client-level SSDs that we have ever tested and trades blows with Samsung's XP941 PCIe SSD (although I must say here that most of the client drives we have tested are SATA based, s...
Die G.Skill Pheonix Blade ist zweifellos eine sehr leistungsfähige SSD. Kopieraufgaben erledigt das Laufwerk rasend schnell, auch wenn sie beim Schreiben komprimierter Daten fast auf die Geschwindigkeit eines guten Einzellaufwerkes fällt. Die Geschw...
Очень высокая последовательная скорость передачи, Практически нет потери производительности под стрессовой нагрузкой, Поддержка TRIM, Загрузочный
Средняя производительность в повседневных сценариях, RAIDконтроллер требует установки драйвера, Дорогой и потенциально ненадёжный дизайн
Производительность G.Skill Phoenix Blade SSD нельзя описать одним предложением, так что без подробностей не обойтись. В повседневных сценариях, для которых актуальна скорость чтения мелких блоков при небольшой глубине очереди, Phoenix Blade SSD не удается...
Die Performance der G.Skill Phoenix Blade SSD lässt sich nicht in einem Satz zusammenfassen, eine Differenzierung ist hier unbedingt notwendig. Bei den für den Alltag wichtigen Szenarien wie dem Lesen von kleinen Blöcken bei niedriger Anfragetiefe hat d...
Published: 2014-11-27, Author: Luke , review by: kitguru.net
Excellent sequential performance, Strong random write performance, Good build quality and design, Installation flexibility (halfheight form factor), Good software tools (can restore drive performance and boot Windows)
Very expensive compared to multiple SATA drives and Plextor M6e, 4KB random read performance only comparable to current flagship SATA 6Gbps SSDs, 480GB capacity only – 240GB would be welcomed.
The G.Skill Phoenix Blade is a bold move by the Taiwanese company, and one that is done with the intention of reclaiming its place amongst the elite high-performance SSD vendors. Highly competitive performance and a solid design, are how G.Skill has manag...
Published: 2014-11-24, Author: Joe , review by: legitreviews.com
Looking at the capacity of the G.SKILL Phoenix Blade 480GB PCIe SSD we saw total of 512GB(1GB byte = 1,000,000,000 bytes) of NAND on board and Windows reports the capacity accessible to the end user as 447 GiB (1Gib = 1,073,741,824 bytes) which is typical...
Excellent straight-line speed, Fast at writing, Cheaper than other PCIe drives
Single capacity, Not NVMe-compatible
Modern consumer SSDs are able to saturate the SATA 6Gbps interface introduced a few years ago and now available on practically every motherboard. Advances such as SATA Express and full-bandwidth M.2 have yet to materialise en masse, leaving the door open...
This year we'll see 10 Gbps interfaces like the M2 port take off, bringing performance close to say 700 - 800 MB/sec on a small SSD that you infect inject into your motherboard. The next step is a PCI Express based add-in card in RAID and multiple NAND F...
Increased IOPS and throughput as compared to the OCZ RevoDrive 350, Lower cost/GB than the OCZ RevoDrive 350 (see below), SCSI device boot compatibility more widely supported than NVMe at present
Low Queue Depth response time and IOPS remains limited by SandForce controllers, Lack of NVMe support translates to greater CPU penalty per IO, Required driver complicates OS install, Only available in 480GB capacity
PROS:Increased IOPS and throughput as compared to the OCZ RevoDrive 350Lower cost/GB than the OCZ RevoDrive 350 (see below)SCSI device boot compatibility more widely supported than NVMe at presentCONS:Low Queue Depth response time and IOPS remains limited...
