my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 2.5GHz Socket 775



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 2.5GHz Socket 775

Testseek.com have collected 27 expert reviews of the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 2.5GHz Socket 775 and the average rating is 83%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 2.5GHz Socket 775.
 
(83%)
27 Reviews
Users
(94%)
435 Reviews
83 0 100 27

 

Reviews

page 2 of 3
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2008-07-25, Author: Leo , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • The Q9300 may sound relatively expensive compared to the Q6600 but it's well worth the extra money. Kentsfield is history and Penryn rules the heights....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2008-07-21, review by: overclockersclub.com

  • Overclocking, Low voltage for max overclock, 45nm...
  • 6MB L2 cache, Gets hot when overclocked, Price...
  • As a comparison to the existing quad core Intel CPUs, there really is not much of a comparison. The Q9300 just barely performs better than the Q6600 in the comparison field of processors. In many ways, it is handicapped by the lower amount of L2 cache...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2008-07-20, review by: hardwarebase.net

  • U odnosu na Core 2 Quad Q6600, Q9300 donosi poboljšanja u performansama, podršku za SSE 4.1 set instrukcija te napredniji proizvodni proces što automatski znači nižu potrošnja i zagrijavanje. Nedostatak u ovom slučaju odnosi se na oveclock, vezano za s...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-07-05, review by: hwt.dk

  • Abstract:  Intels firekernede cpuer har efterhånden fået et godt ry. På trods af at det ikke er en ægte quadcore, men blot to dualcore-chips klistret sammen, formår Intel alligevel i kraft af Core-teknikken at holde et solidt forspring ned til forfølgerne. Q660...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-05-30, review by: tek.no

  • Meget god ytelse, Hyggelig effektforbruk, Klokker bra
  • Kunne vært rimeligere?
  • Beklager AMD, men dette duger ikke. I hvert fall ikke i kampen mot Intels firekjerner. Den hvasseste firekjernen i Phenom-serien må bite i gresset for den tregeste firekjernen fra Intels nye 9xxx-serie. Det tyder ikke bra. Likevel, Phenom-prosessoren ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-05-26, review by: Behardware.com

  • Abstract:  May 26, 2008 Since the launch of the first model at the end of October, Intel 45nm Core 2 processors have created quite a stir. First of all, there has been the positive aspect of first rate performances while on the negative side availability has bee...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-05-02, review by: madshrimps.be

  • Abstract:  Win MSI VGA, Motherboard, Laptop in this Overclocking Contest! Intel C2Q Q9300:The Q9300 was released a few months ago and has been updated a few times since. The series started out with the C0 stepping, moved on to C1 and recently, the M1 stepping ha...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-04-28, review by: hothardware.com

  • As our benchmark results and power consumption tests have shown, Intel’s Core 2 Quad Q9300 represents a solid upgrade over the Core 2 Quad Q6600, which we’ve come to know and love. Even though the Q9300 has a decreased cache size and only meag...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2008-04-28, review by: laruche.com

  • Autant nous avions été emballés par les quad-core QX9650 et QX9770 pour les performances, autant le Q9300 nous laisse un goût amer. La cause ? Ce processeur quad-core d’entrée de gamme est supposé prendre la place du plus petit quad-core de la génér...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-04-28, review by: custompc.co.uk

  • The Core 2 Quad Q9300 costs £56 more than Intels cheapest quad-core CPU, the Core 2 Quad Q6600. Its clearly the runt of new litter too, with its 6MB cache (half the amount of the other 45m CPUs) and low clock speeds. Its only marginally faster at s...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(79%)
    page 2 of 3 « Previous   1 2 3   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×