my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Intel Core i5 655K 3.2GHz Socket 1156



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i5 655K 3.2GHz Socket 1156

Testseek.com have collected 58 expert reviews of the Intel Core i5 655K 3.2GHz Socket 1156 and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i5 655K 3.2GHz Socket 1156.
Award: Recommended June 2010
June 2010
 
(79%)
58 Reviews
Users
(90%)
2 Reviews
79 0 100 58

 

Reviews

page 3 of 6
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2010-08-16, review by: madboxpc.com

  • El overclock fue la sección a la que más tiempo le dedicamos en este mini análisis ya que realmente teníamos que probar y re-probar las capacidades de este procesador que se supone está hecho a la medida de los overclockeros más exigentes.Luego de bast...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-08-10, review by: nordichardware.se

  • Prestanda i flertrådade miljöer,
  • Dyr, Överklockningspotential under kyla, Erbjuder inget mervärde över i7870

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-07-28, review by: benchmarkreviews.com

  • Unlocked CPU multiplier and RAM dividers, Great Overclocker, not limited by motherboard/RAM, Efficient 32nm process, Includes Intel GMA HD 45nm graphics unit, AES instructions update made it at least 10x faster, Performance over AMD X3 processors thanks to Turbo Boost and Hyper Threading, Great performance/clock ratio, Low power consumption,
  • Costs $30 more than the Core i5 650
  • The Core i5 655K performed decently against other CPUs. Thanks to features like Turbo Boost and Hyper-Threading, this sample was able to outperform the Athlon II X3 in nearly all the tests when they were targeted at multi-core solutions. Of course, if...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2010-07-23, review by: pctuner.net

  • Il Core i5 655k e il Core i7 875k rappresentano un cambiamento di strategia per la casa di Santa Clara: per la prima volta vengono commercializzati processori non Extreme dotati di moltiplicatore sbloccato. La scelta, apparentemente forte, rappresenta ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-07-20, review by: techradar.com

  • Superb dual-core performance, Plenty of overclcoking headroom
  • Silly money for a dualie, Integrated graphics is redundant
  • Intel makes some outrageously good CPUs. This isn't one of them. It's the wrong chip at the wrong price.Follow TechRadar Reviews on Twitter...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2010-07-18, review by: unlimitpc.com

  • ครับผม สำหรับซีพียูตัวนี้ Intel Core i5-655K เนี่ย ประสิทธิภาพ ความสามารถเรื่องโอเวอร์คล็อกถือว่าทำได้ดุเอาเรื่องดีเหมือนกันครับ ขนาดเล่นบนฮีตซิงค์ธรรมดา ก็มีเลข 5 ให้เห็นรำไรกันแล้ว นึกไม่ออกเหมือนกันครับว่าถ้ามันไปอยู่ในมือเทพๆ แล้วเนี่ย จะแร...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-07-02, review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • You could argue that the unlocked multiplier allows for better overclocks on motherboards that can't hit a 200MHz Base Clock (cheap boards, in other words), but whether you overclock via the Base Clock or the CPU multiplier, you'll still have to add extra...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2010-06-28, Author: Jake , review by: pureoverclock.com

  • As we mentioned at the outset, the Core i5 655K is a bit of an oddball chip that shakes things up in Intel's lower-end lineup. In this case, oddball isn't a bad thing. Bringing an unlocked multiplier to the market at an affordable price certainly is un...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2010-06-11, review by: Computerpoweruser.com

  • Abstract:  Although nothing to write home about architecturally, Intel is making a play for AMD’s favorite audience, the cost-conscious overclocker crowd. Enthusiasts, meet Intel’s latest take on fast and affordable

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-06-07, review by: overclock3d.net

  • i7-875KIt's a curious set of results that aren't too easy to read much into. Some tests it came out looking very good at stock speeds, and others it really struggled with.The thing that makes this hardest to understand is that to all intents and purpos...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(70%)
    page 3 of 6 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×