my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB GDDR5 PCIe



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB GDDR5 PCIe

Testseek.com have collected 269 expert reviews of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 92%. Scroll down and see all reviews for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2GB GDDR5 PCIe.
Award: Editor’s Choice March 2012
March 2012
 
(92%)
269 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
92 0 100 269

 

Reviews

page 8 of 27
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-02-28, Author: Christian , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  It hasn't been a long time that Unigine Corporation released a new version of their Heaven benchmark. One day after that, they showed a new benchmark: Unigine Valley 1.0. The developer team behind which has its roots in Siberia, found inspiration in their...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-02-25, Author: Koen , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  A few days ago we introduced you to the concept of of frametime tests , a more accurate way of gauging graphics card performance in video games. Today we are applying the new test for the first time, and with the new data we will compare the AMD Radeon...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-02-24, Author: Koen , review by: hardware.info

  • We concludeerden eerder al dat de Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 en de AMD Radeon HD 7970 prima zijn om vrijwel alle moderne games in Full HD resolutie met maximale settings te spelen. Pakken we het gemiddelde van de 99ste percentiel waardes van de vijf geteste...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-02-16, Author: Wolfgang , review by: computerbase.de

  • Abstract:  Zuletzt hatten wir unseren Grafikkarten-Testparcours im August letzten Jahres aktualisiert und dabei auch die Hardware gewechselt: So setzten wir von dort an auf Intels Ivy-Bridge-CPU, die nicht nur mehr Leistung bietet, sondern auch den neuen PCIe-3.0-St...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-02-14, review by: playwares.com

  • Abstract:  플웨즈 게임벤치마크 담당 이은광 입니다. 지난번 AMD의 CATALYST 13.2BETA 벤치마크를 통해 프레임넘버당 지연율을 테스트했었는데 이번에는 AMD와 NVIDIA의 비교벤치를 통해 실제 게임에서의 프레임체감을 살펴보도록 하겠습니다. 2560X1600해상도에서도 원활한 플레이가 가능한만큼 모든 게임에서 같은 해상도로 테스트가 진행되었으며 CROSSFIRE와 SLI의 그래프 비교도 참고하시면 더욱 재밌을거 같네요. -게임 테스트 항목- 1. ALI...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-02-10, Author: Raffael , review by: pcgameshardware.de

  • Abstract:  3DMark im Test: Der neue 3DMark für Windows steht seit dem 4. Februar 2013 zum Download bereit - das Warten auf die Cross-Platform-Version für Windows RT, Android und iOS geht aber weiter. Während Futuremark emsig an der Fertigstellung feilt, testet PC Ga...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-02-04, Author: Koen , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Today Futuremark released a new version of its popular 3DMark benchmarking software, which has been part of the standard Hardware.Info tests since the first version appeared in 1999. Futuremark seems to be taking a cue from Apple with the name this time...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-02-04, review by: ixbt.com

  • Abstract:  Регулярные (ежемесячные) i3D-Speed — это проект iXBT.com, целью которого является предоставление отчетов о производительности целого набора видеокарт на драйверах под Windows 7.В материале присутствуют сводные диаграммы производительности популярных сов...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-01-28, Author: Lundi , review by: 59hardware.net

  • Abstract:  L'histoire ne change pas car AMD et Nvidia semblent partis pour entamer une nouvelle guerre de cent ans. Le profit en revient directement aux joueurs qui bénéficieront de tarifs toujours en baisse mais aussi de nouveaux modèles plus performants.Les deux p...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-01-25, Author: Igor , review by: tomshw.de

  • Abstract:  Manchmal trifft man auf Probleme, die auf den ersten Blick nicht rational erklärbar scheinen. Erst durch gezielte Nachtests auf einem identischen System erkennt man, dass ein Hardwarefehler vorliegt, der nicht konstant, sondern eher zufällig auftritt...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 8 of 27 « Previous   1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 27   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×