my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Samsung GT-I9300 Galaxy S3



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung GT-I9300 Galaxy S3

Testseek.com have collected 993 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-I9300 Galaxy S3 and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-I9300 Galaxy S3.
Award: Editor’s Choice June 2012
June 2012
 
(87%)
993 Reviews
Users
(88%)
22 Reviews
87 0 100 993

The editors liked

  • Paparan skrin 4.8″ yang cantik dengan warna yang hidup. Skrin Super Amoled HD ini juga menggunakan Kaca Gorilla terkini bagi memberikan ketahanan dari calar dan hentakkan
  • Pemproses empat teras 1.4 Ghz memastikan peranti berfungsi dengan baik sekali. Kela

The editors didn't like

  • Binaan dan kemasan yang masih terlalu plastik
  • Tiada penaiktarafan pada kemampuan kemera. Menggunakan semula kamera pada SGS2 dan Note
  • Aplikasi S Voice yang diwarwarkan tidak berfungsi dengan baik. Masih terlalu perlahan
  • Tidak semua aplikasi memnggunaka

 

Reviews

page 30 of 100
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-10-10, review by: chip.pl

  • świetny, duży ekran o przekątnej 4,8”, LTE, NFC, WifiDirect, długi czas pracy akumulatora, wydajność
  • słaba jakość zdjęć w niekorzystnych warunkach oświetleniowych
  • Oczekiwania wobec Samsunga Galaxy S3 LTE były wysokie. Nasze testy wykazały, że faktycznie jest to doskonałe urządzenie, które tylko pod kilkoma względami ustępuje wersji pozbawionej LTE. Generalnie Samsunga Galaxy S3 można uznać za lepszy telefon. Warian...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-09, review by: teltarif.de

  • Bezüglich der technischen Ausstattung, der verfügbaren Netz-Standards sowie der Bedienung ist das Samsung Galaxy S3 LTE ein echtes Spitzen-Smartphone, das momentan kaum zu toppen ist. Mit Android 4.1 Jelly Bean verfügt es außerdem über ein ausgereiftes Be...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(97%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-09, review by: lemagtechno.com

  • Abstract:  La bataille entre le Samsung Galaxy S3 et l’Iphone 5 fait rage. L’une des caractéristiques qui intéresse toujours autant les futurs acheteurs de smartphones réside dans la solidité de leurs appareils. C’est pour cette raison que les vidéos montrant les...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-09, Author: Thomas , review by: hifitest.de

  • Dem Samsung Galaxy S3 gelingt es  scheinbar mühelos, den schärfsten Konkurrenten, nämlich das iPhone  4S, zu schlagen. Ob der Vorsprung die Einführung des iPhone 5  übersteht, mag dahingestellt sein, möglicherweise sind die  Produktionszyklen der beiden P...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-08, review by: extreme.idg.se

  • Abstract:  Prisjämförelser från Prisjakt.nu Samsung GT-i9300 Galaxy S III 16GB Timeoffer 4330.00 Sweden Mobilephone Acc. 4399.00 Bazula 4589.00 Klicka här för att jämföra alla butiker Galaxy S III satt en rejält hög ribba på Android-marknaden, faktiskt ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-08, review by: phonearena.com

  • Abstract:  After pitting four of the biggest stars in the smartphone world right now against one another in our web browsing and display comparisons, we’re once again taking the quartet on yet another worthwhile comparison to proclaim the best of the best in the...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-08, Author: Carly , review by: Theinquirer.net

  • Abstract:  THE INQUIRER has taken the smartphone market's two fiercest rivals, the Apple Iphone 5 and the Samsung Galaxy S3, and pitted them against each other in a head to head video review. Check out our Apple Iphone 5 vs Samsung ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-08, Author: Luke , review by: gizmodo.com.au

  • This is the Galaxy S III we should have got back in June. I'll admit that Jelly Bean wasn't a thing then, but we shouldn't have had to wait for it as long as we did. Same thing with 4G. Telstra — a major launch partner for the Galaxy S III — had a 4G netw...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-08, Author: George , review by: intomobile.com

  • Abstract:  Well, well, well; look what we have here. It's the two phones that everybody loves to hate, the Apple iPhone 5 and the Samsung Galaxy S III. Android lovers usually despise the iPhone 5 and iOS lovers usually despise the Galaxy S III. We've pitted them hea...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-05, review by: cnet.com.au

  • Same great Galaxy S3 design. Great 4.7-inch screen. 4G data speeds
  • 4G heavily impacts battery life. No HDMI port
  • Samsung has slipped 4G into the GS3 mix, but sacrificed battery greatly in the process. This is the still same great phone we saw earlier in the year, but the shorter battery cycles will be a deal breaker for many....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(75%)
    page 30 of 100 « Previous   1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 ... 100   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×