Testseek.com have collected 418 expert reviews of the Samsung SM-A500 Galaxy A5 and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung SM-A500 Galaxy A5.
January 2015
(79%)
418 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(80%)
159 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
790100418
The editors liked
Rekaan premium logam pada sebuah peranti kelas pertengahan. Rekaan tercantik yang dihasilkan Samsung
Fungsi kustomasi tema
Hayat bateri yang bagus
Kemampuan optik yang baik dengan pelbagai pemalam tambahan Samsung. Kualiti gambar yang baik jika dibandi
The editors didn't like
Harga yang agak mahal bagi peranti kelas pertengahan
Pembesar suara mono
Reviews
page 29 of 42
Order by:
Score
Published: 2015-02-27, Author: Pedro , review by: canaltech.com.br
Abstract: Embora traga uma boa combinação de especificações, especialmente para um aparelho intermediário, e uma câmera frontal monstruosa com 5 megapixels, o Galaxy A5 da Samsung tem lá os seus problemas e defeitos que o fazem tropeçar quando o comparamos a aparel...
Published: 2015-02-27, Author: Pedro , review by: canaltech.com.br
Abstract: A Samsung aproveitou a onda de celulares com câmeras frontais mais bem trabalhadas e destinadas a selfies que surgiu no final de 2014 e lançou a linha A de smartphones especificamente para competir nesse segmento de mercado. E esse é o caso do Galaxy A5, ...
Hervorragende Verarbeitung, Gute Performance, Konnektivität lässt keine Wünsche offen,
Software inkonsistent, Bloatware, Akku nicht wechselbar, Zu teuer
Wie ist Samsungs Vordringen in die Welt der Metall-Unibody-Smartphones einzuordnen? Rein an den Leistungsdaten bemessen ist das Galaxy A5 mit einem Straßenpreis von aktuell rund 320 Euro deutlich zu teuer – ein ähnlich, wenn auch nicht ganz so gutes Moto...
Overall screen quality / excellent responsiveness, Slimline and welldesigned, Generally responsive, Quality and varied usage of the front camera
Screen resolution, Quality of graphics was distinctly average during games, Battery life could have been better, 13 Megapixel back camera is average, Android 4.4 KitKat and not Lollipop (5.0)
What's happened, Samsung? The brand's rushed and rather desperate attempt to claw back its monopoly of the mobile market by clumsily producing a series of duplicates has spawned a Galaxy A—a series which has struggled to garner interest, while its competi...
Estilosa carcasa de metal, Diseño sobrio y elegante, Carcasa muy delgada y rígida, Soberbia reproducción de color de la pantalla, Elevado brillo y buenísimos ángulos de visión, Amplio software, Decente equipación de cámara, Pantalla táctil precisa, Prácti
Ahora no se puede sacar la batería, Apps adware preinstaladas, Desfavorable posición del altavoz, y calidad, El micrófono chasquea en ocasiones
Abstract: På avstand ser Galaxy A3 og A5 ut som helt typiske Samsung-mobiler, men ved nærmere øyesyn, finner vi de lekreste telefonene selskapet har laget til nå. De to nykommerne er selskapets første forsøk på mobiler helkledd i metall, hvis vi ser bort fra 2014-...
Snyggt metallhölje, Enkel, elegant design, Tunt och styvt chassi, Utmärkt färgreproduktion, Hög ljusstyrka och bra betraktningsvinklar, Bra mjukvara, Skapliga kameror, Exakt pekskärm, Praktisk batteritid
Fast batteri numera, Förinstallerade adwareappar, Högtalarens opraktiska placering., ...och kvalitet, Mikrofonen klickar ibland
Samsung's Galaxy A5 already has us excited about the upcoming Galaxy S6 flagship, further proving that the Korean giant can produce a smartphone with gorgeous and solid design and resist from cramming it full of pointless features. It's a shame that the l...
Abstract: Galaxy A5 wygląda na urządzenie klasy premium, ale należy do kategorii urządzeń mid-range'owych. Widać to przede wszystkim w testach wydajności. Galaxy A5 ma 64-bitowy procesor Snapdragon 410. To 4-rdzeniowa jednostka...
AMOLED-y nowej generacji to najlepsze ekrany, jakie są stosowane w urządzeniach mobilnych. Ten, który jest w A5 ustępuje co prawda wyświetlaczom z Note'a 4 czy Galaxy S5, ale nieznacznie i głównie z powodu niższej rozdzielczości. HD trudno jednak zaliczyć...
