my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Samsung SM-A500 Galaxy A5



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung SM-A500 Galaxy A5

Testseek.com have collected 418 expert reviews of the Samsung SM-A500 Galaxy A5 and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung SM-A500 Galaxy A5.
Award: Recommended January 2015
January 2015
 
(79%)
418 Reviews
Users
(80%)
159 Reviews
79 0 100 418

The editors liked

  • Rekaan premium logam pada sebuah peranti kelas pertengahan. Rekaan tercantik yang dihasilkan Samsung
  • Fungsi kustomasi tema
  • Hayat bateri yang bagus
  • Kemampuan optik yang baik dengan pelbagai pemalam tambahan Samsung. Kualiti gambar yang baik jika dibandi

The editors didn't like

  • Harga yang agak mahal bagi peranti kelas pertengahan
  • Pembesar suara mono

 

Reviews

page 4 of 42
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2016-03-29, Author: Krzysztof , review by: galaktyczny.pl

  • Krzysztof Nawrot, Twórca strony galaktyczny.pl. Skończony informatyk, gadżeciarz, miłośnik urządzeń mobilnych i nowych technologii. Więcej na stronie Redakcja, Komentarze (3), Samsung wprowadzając ponad rok temu serię Galaxy A wykonał krok w dobrym kierun
  • Krzysztof Nawrot
  • Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016) to smartfon ze średniej półki, który ma wiele wspólnego z flagowcami, nawet tymi tegorocznymi. Zaczynamy od wysokiej jakości materiałów gdzie połączono metal ze szkłem i świetnego, nowoczesnego wzornictwa, przez zadowalającą wydaj...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(89%)
 
  Published: 2016-03-16, review by: technikalia.pl

  • Abstract:  Testowany Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016) spokojnie mógłby aspirować do miana flagowca u niejednego producenta smartfonów. W Samsungu jednak są też znacznie bardziej wypasione modele, więc to raczej średniak, chociaż kosztujący swoje. W naszej recenzji sprawdzam...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-03-13, Author: Andreas , review by: notebookcheck-tr.com

  • Harika ekran, Çok iyi yapım kalitesi, Çok uzun batarya ömrü, Düşük emisyonlar, Genişletilebilir depolama alanı, Parmak izi okuyucu
  • Ortalama performans, Batarya değiştirilemiyor, Arka taraf kaygan, PWM

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(84%)
 
  Published: 2016-03-12, review by: notebookcheck.biz

  • Un superbe écran, Très bonne finition, Autonomie impressionnante, Faibles nuisances, Lecteur de cartes mémoires microSD, Lecteur d'empreintes digitales
  • Des performances moyennes, Batterie inamovible, Coque arrière qui manque de grip, Scintillement PWM

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(84%)
 
  Published: 2016-03-11, Author: Andreas , review by: notebookcheck.it

  • schermo superbo, ottima qualità di costruzione, autonomia ampia, emissioni contenute, spazio espandibile tramite micro-SD, scanner impronte digitali
  • performance medie, batteria non removibile, lato posteriore scivoloso, PWM flickering

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(84%)
 
  Published: 2016-03-11, Author: Deepali , review by: intellectdigest.in

  • The pros of Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 outweigh its cons and despite some minor flaws it is a great package. The Galaxy A5 2016) is a great combination of premium looks and superior performance. If you are looking for a smartphone with premium looks, excellen...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-03-10, Author: ngnix , review by: helpix.ru

  • Купил бы я А5 снова Вряд ли. Рекомендую ли вам Не знаю. С одной стороны, он классный, а с другой - слишком уж много нюансов и неопределенностей. И у меня стойкое желание отныне забыть мобильную технику марки Samsung, после А5, о котором я рассказал сего...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-03-09, Author: Andreas , review by: notebookcheck.nl

  • uitstekend scherm, erg goede bouwkwaliteit, erg lange batterijduur, lage emissies, opslag uitbreidbaar via micro-SD, vingerafdruklezer
  • matige prestaties, niet-verwijderbare batterij, gladde achterkant, PWM-flikkeren

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(84%)
 
  Published: 2016-03-09, review by: technave.com

  • For a RM1599 mid-range smartphone, it's kind of a bit pricey considering the moderate performance it could do. The camera is one issue, not everyone has basic photography skills to overcome those overexposed pictures. But the battery life is great though...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-03-08, Author: Andreas , review by: notebookcheck.org

  • pantalla soberbia, muy buena construcción, larguísima duración de batería, bajas emisiones, almacenamiento ampliable por micro-SD, lector de huellas
  • rendimiento mediocre, batería no extraíble, trasera resbaladiza, parpadeo PWM

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(84%)
    page 4 of 42 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 42   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×