Testseek.com have collected 513 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB HBM2 PCIe and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB HBM2 PCIe.
August 2017
(79%)
513 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
790100513
Reviews
page 46 of 52
Order by:
Score
Published: 2017-08-19, Author: Luke , review by: kitguru.net
Strong competitor for GTX 1070, Good 1440P gaming performance, Operating temperatures are decent, despite the loud cooler, Cost-effective variable refresh rate gaming solution with a FreeSync monitor, Different software-based power profiles give flexibili
High power consumption in the performance-biased ‘Turbo' mode, Loud cooler, Dual 8-pin connectors seems unnecessary and may deter some potential customers
In Radeon RX Vega56, AMD has a worthy competitor to Nvidia's popular GTX 1070. The Vega 10-based AMD card offers performance that is generally faster than a GTX 1070 Founders Edition. RX Vega56 also manages to hit a solid performance sweet-spot for 1440P...
Was this review helpful?
Award
(85%)
Published: 2017-08-17, Author: Marc , review by: golem.de
AMD will die Radeon RX Vega 56 ab dem 28. August 2017 für 400 Euro in den Handel bringen. Es gilt jedoch abzuwarten, ob dieser Preis haltbar ist, nachdem die Radeon RX 64 schon 650 Euro oder mehr statt 500 Euro kostet. Obendrein sind ab September Custom-M...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and the GeForce GTX 1070 is supposedly the sweet spot for three Vega cards released by AMD thus far. AMD is banking that the Vega 56 will be the high-performance card to buy at the $399 price point once it starts shipping on Augu...
Competitive with an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070, Vega 56 Radeon Red Pack may add sweetener for some buyers
Lags behind the GTX 1070 on some titles (a few older games at 1080p, in our tests), High TDP and power requirements versus competing Nvidia cards
AMD's stepped-down $399 Vega card is a solid alternative to Nvidia's similarly priced GeForce GTX 1070, making it a good fit for no-compromise 1440p gaming. (Nvidia still has a strong lead on power efficiency, though.) Read More...
Abstract: Am heutigen 14. August debütieren gleich mehrere Oberklasse-Grafikkarten aus dem Hause AMD: Die Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid, die Radeon RX Vega 64 Air und die Radeon RX Vega 56. Letztere ist ausschließlich als luftgekühlte Variante erhältlich und als einzige...
Низкий уровень шума в режиме бездействия, Лучшее соотношение производительности на ватт, Более гибкая конфигурация с Radeon iChill и профилями производительности, Новые технологии, такие как HBM2, HBCC и т.д
If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of them "great." AMD is certainly competitive once again in the high-end of the market, and its Radeon packs make going al...
Faster than the GeForce GTX 1070, Much more power efficient than RX Vega 64, Quieter than RX Vega 64, Enhanced Sync works amazingly well, FreeSync at no increased monitor cost, New instructions, packed math, primitive shaders, Simplified tuning profiles i
Higher power draw than comparable NVIDIA cards, Noisy, Coil noise at high FPS, Fan does not stop in idle
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is expected to retail for $399. Faster than the GeForce GTX 1070 Much more power efficient than RX Vega 64 Quieter than RX Vega 64 Enhanced Sync works amazingly well FreeSync at no increased monitor cost New instructions, pa...
Published: 2017-08-14, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Solid performance across the board. 8GB of HBM 2 memory should prove useful in the long term. Matches the current performance value king, the GTX 1070, which is no small feat. Modern DX12 architecture. Freesync gaming, yea
Vega seems to be less efficient than Nvidia's Pascal. We were expecting a bit more from the late challenger
Oh yes, I'll state it again. Personally I do appreciate Vega 56 better compared to the 64. Vega 56 offers and is a better proposition at 399 USD. That money just feels right for what you get. It's more or less 10% slower than the 64 (air-cooled model) yet...
