my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 348 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice April 2017
April 2017
 
(88%)
348 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
88 0 100 348

 

Reviews

page 26 of 35
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.com

  • Strength in heavily threaded workloads, Superior pricetoperformance ratio for budget workstations, Unlocked ratio multiplier
  • High price relative to Core i57600K, Lower overclocking headroom
  • The Ryzen 5 1600X provides a tremendous price-to-performance ratio for budget workstations that rivals Intel's Broadwell-E offerings. Ryzen 5 also provides playable performance in most games, but it lags the Intel competition and doesn't have as much...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, review by: Computerpoweruser.com

  • Abstract:  Last month we took the shrink wrap off the eight-core Ryzen 7 CPUs, and now it's the six-core Ryzen 5 1600X's turn to upend the sub $300 processor market.The Ryzen 5 1600X is based on the same Summit Ridge architecture in the Ryzen 7, and in an unpreceden...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Marco , review by: hothardware.com

  • Strong Overall Performance, Up To 6-Cores / 12-Threads, Power Friendly, Aggressive Pricing
  • Performance Anomalies In A Few Benchmarks, Lack-Luster Overclocking In Early Stages
  • With that said, though lower-resolution game performance with non-optimized titles remains an issue for Ryzen, that situation is improving. A recent patch for Ashes of the Singularity doesn't put Ryzen on the same level as Intel's high-end processors, but...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Hilbert , review by: guru3d.com

  • After Ryzen 7 the tide has now turned to Ryzen 5, and it has been an interesting time for AMD. The processor launch has been good, but not great. The Ryzen platform is still a little immature. This mainly focuses on memory compatibility and somewhat lower...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: W1zzard , review by: techpowerup.com

  • Convincingly beats the Core i5-7600K "Kaby Lake", Trades blows with costlier i7-7700K in some tests, Features SMT/HTT (which competing Intel Core i5 quad-core chips lack), Single-threaded performance improved over previous generation, Unlocked multiplier,
  • Gaming frame rates lower than competing Intel chips, High power draw, Memory frequency options and memory compatibility limited, Setup complicated (memory, HPET, CCX, SMT, and power profile), Overclocking barely worth it, Requires optimized apps of which
  • The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X currently retails for $250. Convincingly beats the Core i5-7600K "Kaby Lake" Trades blows with costlier i7-7700K in some tests Features SMT/HTT (which competing Intel Core i5 quad-core chips lack) Single-threaded performance impro...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(91%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Vegar , review by: tek.no

  • AMD Ryzen 5 1600X og Ryzen 5 1500X er selskapets foreløpige toppmodeller med henholdsvis seks og fire prosessorkjerner, og er begge basert på AMDs åttekjernede design.Ryzen 5 1600X er i praksis en Ryzen 7 1800X med to kjerner avslått, men til omtrent halv...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(85%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Renissen2 , review by: hwt.dk

  • Den testede CPU overraskede mig en hel del i den meget gode ydelse på "kun" 6 kerner. Det var glædeligt at se den kunne følge med de tunge drenge i RYZEN 7 rækken, så længe man ikke lægger tunge byrder på dens skuldre. Jeg kunne sagtens se denne 1600X...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(93%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Bruno , review by: reviewstudio.net

  • performance, overclocking, power consumption, value
  • AMD Ryzen 7 produced a revolution in the 8-core area, offering at least the same performance as Intel LGA2011 counterparts, but at half price. Now Ryzen 5 came to compete with LGA1151 solutions, and AMD banged Intel's head again with 1600X, a 6-core/12-th...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(95%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Guillaume , review by: hardware.fr

  • Abstract:  Après le lancement des Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X et 1700 début mars, AMD complète aujourd'hui sa gamme Ryzen avec le lancement des Ryzen 5. Au programme, quatre nouvelles références qui tentent de proposer un rapport performance/prix compétitif. Qu'en est-il...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.fr

  • Abstract:  Après les Ryzen 7 visant les passionnés, voici les Ryzen 5 qui vont tenter de convaincre les joueurs d'abandonner les Core i5 aux alentours de 200 euros.AMD a commencé son offensive par le haut de gamme avec les Ryzen 7. Même s'ils offrent des performance...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 26 of 35 « Previous   1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... 35   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×