Testseek.com have collected 224 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
(67%)
224 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
First consumer eightcore processor, Officially supports 4GHzplus turbo speeds and DDR31866 memory, An FX system has 42 PCIE lanes as opposed to the 24 lanes of a Sandy Bridge system, 990FX chipset supports NVIDIA SLI. Finally, AMD finally has a 32nm processor with good overclocking,
Requires a new Socket AM3 motherboard, Single core performance has remained static, Full performance requires Windows 8 system and applications that use its new instructions, Overall similar performance to Core i5 2500K, but at a higher price
Benchmark tests should always be taken with a grain of salt. It's difficult to try and isolate the performance difference a single component in a computer system makes, especially when it's necessary to compare across different manufacturers and platf...
Good MT Performance, 8-Cores, 32nm Process, Fairly Overclockable, Affordably Priced
Consumed More Power Than 45nm Phenom II, Intel Still Offers Better Overall Performance and Power, Questionable Single Thread Performance
8-Core FX Series Processor DieAMD will be launching four FX series processors today, the flagship 125W FX-8150 we've shown you here, along with another a lower-clocked, 125W 8-core chip dubbed the FX-8120, a 95W 6-core processor called the FX-6100, and fi...
Honestly, AMD's Bulldozer didn't turn out as impressive as it sounded. In many applications, it is barely better than the Phenom II X6 1100T, and in a few others it's actually worse. However, these applications either weren't highly multi-threaded, or ...
time Alrighty, time to give a small overview of the previous pages : The AMD FX-8150 CPU out of the box, is not really what many might have expected. Why ? As it is hardly any better in older apps then the previous AMD Thuban lineup. I explicitly ment...
So, let’s say someone puts Core i5-2500K and FX-8150 in front of you. The Core i5 costs $220 bucks, and the FX runs $245. Which one do you buy? If it’s me, I’m going with the Core i5. I gave the -2500K a Tom’s Hardware Recommended Buy award back in Jan...
Abstract: Perhaps the most hotly-anticipated launch in 2011, AMD’s FX processor line-up is finally ready for prime time. Does the company’s new Bulldozer architecture have what it takes to face Intel’s Sandy Bridge and usher in a new era of competition? How much...
Da ist sie also endlich, AMDs nagelneue Bulldozer-Architektur, die die Basis für eine erfolgreiche Zukunft legen soll und in Form der FX-Prozessoren unsere Rechner erobern möchte. Zweifelsohne sind die neuen Prozessoren, angeführt vom Topmodell AMD FX-...
In many cases, AMD's FX-8150 is able to close the gap between the Phenom II X6 and Intel's Core i5 2500K. Given the right workload, Bulldozer is actually able to hang with Intel's fastest Sandy Bridge parts. We finally have a high-end AMD CPU with power g...
AMD has been buzzing along as of late with the release of Zacate and Llano. The new direction of the company has really been a breath of fresh air especially with the introduction of “Fusion” technology. The on-die GPU’s that support DX11 are simply gr...
When AMD released the X6 1095T me and VB had a serious argument about how good we thought it was and where it placed in the grand scheme of things. Suffice to say that with the FX8150 there was no such debate. At all.Bulldozer has been hyped as the next b...
