my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 224 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
 
(67%)
224 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
67 0 100 224

 

Reviews

page 19 of 23
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: cowcotland.com

  • Avec son FX, AMD nous promet un processeur très moderne, peut être un peu trop d'ailleurs. La nouvelle architecture Zambezi et plus particulièrement le CMT ne semblent pas à l’aise avec les applications anciennes, et les résultats sur certaines applica...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: pcmag.com

  • Excellent multithreaded performance, Attractive price, Unlocked multiplier for simplified overclocking,
  • Not always faster than competing Intel or AMD CPUs, Sluggish with multi-threaded workloads, High power usage under load, No integrated graphics, May require new motherboard, Windows 8 required for some features,
  • AMD threatens to make a dent in Intel’s performance leadership with its FX-8150 CPU, the first to use the company’s completely redesigned Bulldozer core architecture, but stumbles in a few key areas. ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: presence-pc.com

  • Abstract:  De combien de cores a-t-on réellement besoin ? Deux ? Quatre ? Six ? La réponse, comme souvent, dépend de ce que l’on fait de son ordinateur. D’après notre expérience, la plupart des jeux tournent mieux sur une machine en possédant au moins trois. Bon ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: nordichardware.se

  • Kompatibel med vissa Socket AM3moderkort, Förhållandevis god prestanda i tungt flertrådade program,
  • Undermålig prestanda i förhållande till priset, Hög strömförbrukning, Extremt hög strömförbrukning vid överklockning, Får i vissa fall slåss mot Intels instegsprodukter

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, Author: Tarinder , review by: HEXUS.net

  • Modern design, elegant modular architecture, Attractive pricing, AM3socket is backwards compatible
  • Not as fast as Thuban (1100T) in lightload apps, Underload powerdraw not ideal, Arguably still behind Intel's SB as an allround chip

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: madboxpc.com

  • He usado AMD desde que tuve que comprar el primer equipo con dinero de mi bolsillo y no tarjeta de crédito de algún familiar, por lo que me siento más que familiarizado con la excelente relación calidad/precio que han otorgado a los ñoños faltos de din...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: eteknix.com

  • Abstract:  I used to be quite a big fan of AMD, when the good old Athlon Mobile processors hit the market. They seemed to offer the best bang for buck in terms of performance and overclockability and they quickly became a hit.After this, AMD continued to offer typic...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: pcinpact.com

  • Abstract:  Comme prévu, c'est aujourd'hui qu'AMD officialise ses AMD FX 4000, 6000 et 8000, les premiers processeurs grand public à exploiter sa nouvelle architecture Bulldozer et le socket AM3+. Un hommage aux anciens Athlon 64 FX, dont tout le monde espère qu'i...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Het was augustus 2007 toen we op Hardware.Info voor het eerst publiceerden over AMD's plannen om een nieuwe processorontwerp met codenaam Bulldozer te introduceren. Destijds was het de bedoeling om de Bulldozer-architectuur al in 2009 op de markt te br...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, Author: Scott , review by: Techreport.com

  • You've seen the performance results and probably have a sense of where things stand, but we can summarize them with more precision using one of our world-famous price-performance scatter plots. (We've omitted a few really expensive CPUs, because they ten...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 19 of 23 « Previous   1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×