Testseek.com have collected 64 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8320E 3.2GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8320E 3.2GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
March 2015
(82%)
64 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(94%)
44 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
82010064
Reviews
page 5 of 7
Order by:
Score
Published: 2015-01-20, Author: Ian , review by: anandtech.com
Anyone building a new performance system today is not exactly spoiled for choice. On the super extreme end, native octo-core processors with threading are in the market. AMD's high end FX models start by comparison to the Core i5 line but boasts double th...
Published: 2015-01-19, Author: Markus , review by: technic3d.com
Der AMD FX-8320E hinterlässt einen etwas unentschlossen Eindruck. Nach wie vor setzt AMD bei seiner FX Serie auf Basis des AM3+ Sockels auf die inzwischen etwas betagte Piledriver Architektur, die APUs mit integrierter Grafikeinheit erreichen wohlgemerkt ...
TEST: AMD FX-8320E, Hardware udlånt af: AMD, Skrevet af Michael Hermansen den 17. Jan 2015. Testen er vist 3910 gange, Flere tests i kategorien Processor, Del med dine venner, Slutteligt er vi kommet til at tjekke pris og konklusion, og jeg vil kun kigge
95 watt TDP er stadig meget, Bruger ekstra strøm i forhold til lignende Intel CPU'er, Overclock kræver meget strøm, hvilket medfører højere varmeudvikling
Ja, så er vi nået til vejs ende, og jeg sidder egentlig med en ganske fornuftig mavefornemmelse omkring AMD FX-8320E. Omtalte CPU er designet til at være en neddroslet og energibesparende version end sin mere strømslugende broder FX-8320, og det er den. ...
Published: 2015-01-15, Author: Giuseppe , review by: nexthardware.com
Abstract: Nel mese di settembre 2014, in concomitanza con la presentazione della scheda grafica Radeon R9 285, AMD ha lanciato sul mercato tre nuovi processori appartenenti alla serie FX, che identifica da tempo immemore i chip top di gamma dotati di moltiplicatore...
Published: 2015-01-13, Author: Javier , review by: geeknetic.es
Creo que a nadie se le descubre que AMD perdió hace tiempo la capacidad de seguir el ritmo de su competidor principal pero eso no significa que no tenga productos muy interesantes y competitivos que, como iniciábamos este articulo, consiguen llegar a cier...
With the FX-8320e AMD have managed to create a very well balanced CPU. It offers performance very close to the more expensive 8370e however does so at a lower price point and with a touch less heat/power use. The CPU performs best in tasks which fully tak...
After spending time with both the AMD FX-8320E and the MSI 970 Gaming I came out with a mostly positive outlook. For starters, the board is packed full of features and is selling for a great price. When you combine the board with the FX-8320E you have a...
Si nos ceñimos al guión, que no es otro que el de tener una plataforma Gaming 1080p asequible, no cabe duda de que AMD ha hecho un gran trabajo con este procesador FX-8320E que hemos puesto a prueba en el día de hoy Nos entrega un rendimiento muy simi
8 cores for not much cash, Overclockabilty, Strong performance in heavily threaded workloads, Potential performance win with DX12, No real reason to spend more for an FX9590
Far behind Intel on a percore basis, Powerhungry even at stock clock speeds, Aggressively throttles when overclocked via turbo multiplier
There is no “fastest processor”. When planning your rig, you'll need to make a choice between core count and clock speed . Up until now, the argument for choosing more cores has boiled down to whether or not you regularly perform tasks that spawn lots of ...
