my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4

Testseek.com have collected 137 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4 and the average rating is 90%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4.
Award: Editor’s Choice October 2017
October 2017
 
(90%)
137 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
90 0 100 137

 

Reviews

page 11 of 14
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Илья , review by: 3dnews.ru

  • Ещё год назад поверить в то, что AMD вернётся в самый верхний сегмент процессорного рынка, было совершенно невозможно. Но всё сложилось именно таким образом: микроархитектура Zen смогла, что называется «выстрелить», и на данный момент у компании есть прек...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, review by: benchmark.pl

  • miażdżąca wydajność w zastosowaniach wielowątkowych, 4-kanałowy kontroler pamięci DDR4-2666, możliwość tworzenia konfiguracji 4-way SLI/CrossFireX, funkcjonalna platforma X399, urzekające opakowanie, konkurencyjna cena, odblokowany mnożnik...
  • chociaż potencjał na podkręcanie nie jest zbyt wysoki, wydajność jednego wątka jednak odbiega od konkurencji, wymaga nowego, wydajnego chłodzenia, wysokie temperatury po OC, wysoki pobór mocy po OC

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(96%)
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, review by: nordichardware.se

  • Grym flertrådspr, 64 PCIe-kanaler, Upplåst multi, Grym flertrådspr, 64 PCIe-kanaler, Upplåst multi
  • Högt pris, Ej kompat. med äldre kylare, Högt pris, Ej kompat. med äldre kylare
  • Threadripper 1950X är kulmen av AMD:s nya satsning på entusiastprocessorer och gör ett rejält avtryck i de övre prisklasserna. I Sverige ligger priset omkring en tusenlapp högre än Core i9-7900X, men för de pengarna levererar AMD en imponerande mängd merv...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(68%)
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Marc , review by: golem.de

  • Abstract:  Erstmals seit dem Athlon 64 verkauft AMD wieder Prozessoren, die Intels Topmodell schlagen. Der Ryzen Threadripper 1950X und der 1920X punkten mit enorm hoher Multithread-Leistung, und auch für Spiele haben die CPUs einige Optimierungen erhalten. Ein Te...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Tarinder , review by: HEXUS.net

  • 16 cores and 32 threads for $999, Extremely fast in multi-threaded tasks, Forward-looking X399 platform, Quad-channel memory, Brings competition back to HEDT
  • Single-thread not as good as Intel, Game Mode and Creator Mode confusion
  • AMD has used the word disruptive to describe the new Zen CPU architecture that powers Ryzen desktop CPUs, Epyc server processors and now, in August 2017, a trio of Threadripper chips designed to rip up the existing high-end desktop rule book.Threadrip...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Ryan , review by: pcper.com

  • Hopefully you've been paying attention these last many pages, as the launch of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper processor and X399 platform is not a simple read-the-last-page kind of release. From a technology and architecture stand point, what might at first a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Koen , review by: hardware.info

  • ConclusieMission accomplished AMD! Door de bank genomen mogen we concluderen dat voor workloads waar high-end desktop systemen écht voor bedoeld zijn, AMD na ruim 10 jaar eindelijk weer kan claimen de snelste processor ter wereld te hebben. De circa € 100...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • The Threadripper 1920X offers more performance, uses less power and runs cooler than the Core i97900X. It also supports ECC memory (Intel's X299 platform doesn't). Compared to the Ryzen 7 1800X, the 1920X touts quadchannel memory support and more PCIe lan
  • The $1,000 Threadripper 1950X is competitively priced but nonetheless comes at a hefty premium. Threadripper falls a tad behind when it comes to gaming

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Dennis , review by: hardwareluxx.de

  • sehr hohe Performance in Multithreading-Anwendungen, sehr gute Plattform-Features mit großer Anzahl an PCIe-Lanes, höhere Performance im Vergleich zum Ryzen 7 1800X auch in Spielen, gute Übertaktbarkeit, akzeptabler Stromverbrauch unter Last, gutes Preis-
  • sehr hoher Idle-Stromverbrauch, momentan kein NVME RAID, Auch in diesem Test werfen wir wieder einen Blick auf das interessanteste Modell. Natürlich ist der Threadripper 1950X das schnellste Modell und für alle mit einem dicken Geldbeutel auch das interes
  • Threadripper ist ein richtiges Monster: Mit 32 Threads bombardiert er sämtliche Multi-Core-Benchmarks weg, die wir im Portfolio haben. Das ist aber kein Wunder, denn schon Ryzen hat gezeigt, dass AMD hier schnell unterwegs ist und die pure Kernanzahl von...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Hilbert , review by: guru3d.com

  • Right then, and that was our 2nd Threadripper review already. For the Threadripper 1920X as tested today you will need to pay 799 USD. So that's 200 bucks off compared to the 1950X model. Honestly, if you go for the X399 + Threadripper combo, you might as...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
    page 11 of 14 « Previous   1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×