my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4

Testseek.com have collected 137 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4 and the average rating is 90%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4.
Award: Editor’s Choice October 2017
October 2017
 
(90%)
137 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
90 0 100 137

 

Reviews

page 8 of 14
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-09-07, review by: computerbase.de

  • AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X im DetailDer Ryzen Threadripper 1900X ist eine Besonderheit: Zwei Acht-Kern-Prozessor-Dies jeweils um vier Kerne zu kastrieren; um sie dann anschließend wieder zu einem Acht-Kern-Prozessor zusammen zu schalten, das ist bisher...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-02, review by: tomshw.it

  • Prestazioni con carichi workstation e produttività, prezzo per core, saldatura, facile da raffreddare, prestazioni multi-thread, 60 linee PCI Express,
  • I cambiamenti di modalità richiedono un riavvio, prestazioni di gioco a risoluzioni basse,
  • Ryzen Threadripper 1920X offre gran parte delle caratteristiche di Threadripper 1950X. Di conseguenza le prestazioni nei software che sfruttano i thread sono elevate. Inoltre ha una frequenza base maggiore e più margine in OC rispetto a qualsiasi Ryzen te...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-08-30, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.com

  • Workstation and productivity, Price per core, Solder, Easy to cool, MultiThreaded performance, 60 PCIe lanes
  • Modes changes require a reboot, Lowresolution gaming performance
  • AMD's Threadripper 1920X offers a great price point for a beefy 12 cores and 24 threads, and while you lose four cores compared to the high end Threadripper 1950X, it comes at a $200 savings. That's great news if you are seeking unrestrained connectiv...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-08-30, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Workstation and productivity, Price per core, Solder, Easy to cool, Multi-Threaded performance, 60 PCIe lanes
  • Modes changes require a reboot, Low-resolution gaming performance
  • AMD's Threadripper 1920X offers a great price point for a beefy 12 cores and 24 threads, and while you lose four cores compared to the high end Threadripper 1950X, it comes at a $200 savings. That's great news if you are seeking unrestrained connectivity...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-08-28, Author: coolaler , review by: coolaler.com

  • Abstract:  前言: 從今天起 Ryzen Threadripper將要改變您的視野,因為今天是 AMD桌上型高端平台 HEDT處理器 Ryzen Threadripper 1950X、 1920X的發表日 Ryzen Threadripper 1950X、1920X 即日起上市,1950X售價為 USD$999、1920X售價為 USD$799,而 1900X在 8/31上市售價為 USD$549 1950X 16C32T 3.4GHz/4.0GHz 64PCIE Lanes DDR4 Four Channel...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-25, Author: Diego , review by: adrenaline.uol.com.br

  • Alto desempenho em multi-thread, Grande quantidade de núcleos e threads, Suporte ao Quad-channel e 64 linhas PCIe, Retorno da concorrência ao segmento HEDT, Baixas temperaturas, Custo inferior ao de concorrentes diretos
  • Alto custo, Dependência do quad-channel em jogos, Sem ganho em games comparado a CPUs muito mais baratas
  • O Ryzen Threadripper trouxe novamente a AMD ao jogo do segmento de alto desempenho, e o Threadripper 1920X é uma excelente opção para esse perfil de mercado. No exterior, a diferença de custo entre ele e os modelos 1950X e Core i9 é de 200 dólares aproxim...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2017-08-23, Author: 香香 , review by: lotpc.com

  • 2、游戏性能测试对比通过游戏测试对比,两者没有区别。对比总结:上图是Ryzen 1950X和1920X的区别,具体的选择,还要根据自己的实际情况,预算多的话,还是选择可玩性更高的Ryzen 1950X。其实Ryzen 1920X性能已经足够强大。...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-21, Author: 米田 , review by: 4gamer.net

  • 前述のとおり7900XではAVX-512が使われてしまうため,1950Xの7900Xに対するスコアはほとんど参考にならない。古典的なx86命令を使うMulti-Media Quad-int Native x1 ALUで,1950Xが約57%高いスコアを示し,またAVX-512を使用しない「Multi-Media Quad-float Native x2 FMA」で18%高いスコアを出しているのが見どころだろうか。対1800Xだと1950Xは総合スコアで約92%高いスコアを叩き出し,個別のテストでも78~1...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-18, Author: Jeff , review by: Techreport.com

  • Before we issue a verdict on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Threadripper 1950X, it's time once more to condense our results using our famous value scatter plots. We take the geometric mean of all of our real-world test results and plot that figure agai...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-08-16, Author: Lexagon , review by: overclockers.ru

  • Abstract:  Процессоры AMD Ryzen Threadripper изначально создавались для разгона, и осознание этого факта вывело на страницы HWBot американского энтузиаста 3LFK1NG, который на этой неделе ошибочно удостоился титула автора нового мирового рекорда разгона памяти типа...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 8 of 14 « Previous   1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 14   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×