my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM

Testseek.com have collected 36 expert reviews of the Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM and the average rating is 71%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM.
 
(71%)
36 Reviews
Users
(87%)
985 Reviews
71 0 100 36

 

Reviews

page 1 of 4
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2019-07-11, Author: Matthew , review by: digitalcameraworld.com

  • Extremely lightweight build, Full-time manual focus override
  • Significant autofocus issues, Vignetting and poor sharpness
  • It's a solid lens with a great history, but this one is badly in need of an update and a revamp. Autofocus accuracy is hit-or-miss, especially when using the lens wide open to its full shallow-depth-of-field potential. Sharpness is a little poor and there...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2017-12-05, Author: 梁爽 , review by: xitek.com

  • Abstract:  心血来潮想对比一下50L和50/1.4。由于只有一台5D4机身,所以是用一个镜头拍完,再换另一个镜头拍一遍,取景难保持一样。都是用点测,镜头最大光圈拍摄的,JPG直出缩图,这么AB对比看差别还是比较明显的。文章来源 : 不严谨的EF50/1.2和50/1.4对比...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-11-05, Author: 高君义 , review by: zol.com.cn

  • 纠错与问题建议标签:镜头 dcdv.zol.com.cn true 中关村在线 report 2049 不知道各位朋友在买了自己的单反/微单后,是不是会有想要提升照片质量升级镜头的想法呢?在用惯了各种套头后,添置一颗怎样的镜头最能提升照片直观质量呢?这次,笔者就以自己的经验来好好聊一聊。套头之后选什么 你真的需要一个定焦如果你的第一只镜头是一颗常规的...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-11-05, Author: 高君义 , review by: zol.com.cn

  • 纠错与问题建议标签:镜头 dcdv.zol.com.cn true 中关村在线 report 2049 不知道各位朋友在买了自己的单反/微单后,是不是会有想要提升照片质量升级镜头的想法呢?在用惯了各种套头后,添置一颗怎样的镜头最能提升照片直观质量呢?这次,笔者就以自己的经验来好好聊一聊。套头之后选什么 你真的需要一个定焦如果你的第一只镜头是一颗常规的...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-06, Author: Krzysztof , review by: fotomaniak.pl

  • Abstract:  Który producent ma w ofercie najtańszy pełnoklatkowy zestaw? Ile trzeba wydać na „tani” aparat FF z obiektywami?Wśród fotografów istnieje kult pełnej klatki. Niewątpliwie coś w tym jest, bo jakość obrazu z fulfrejma jest zdecydowanie inna, niż z najlepsze...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-01-24, Author: Bengt , review by: kamerabild.se

  • Ska man utse någon vinnare i det här testet så är det ofrånkomligen Sigman, i alla fall till om man ser till prestanda och upplevd kvalitet. Det är ju också tur eftersom Sigman kan användas på flera olika kameramärken. Är man däremot ute efter något litet...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-12-01, Author: Paul , review by: dxomark.com

  • Abstract:  Our technicians have tested no fewer than 130 lenses on Canon's 50.6Mp EOS 5DS R Digital SLR. With the results for both prime and zoom lenses covering a diverse range of focal lengths, we've got all the data you need for picking out the right lens. In Par...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-08-01, Author: Bengt , review by: kamerabild.se

  • Ska man utse någon vinnare i det här testet så är det ofrånkomligen Sigman, i alla fall till om man ser till prestanda och upplevd kvalitet. Det är ju också tur eftersom Sigman kan användas på flera olika kameramärken. Är man däremot ute efter något litet...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-07-31, Author: Arthur , review by: focus-numerique.fr

  • Ouverture maximale de f/1,4, Motorisation USM, Qualité optique de f/4 à f/11, Très peu de distorsions, Faible vignetage, Pas d'aberrations chromatiques
  • Pas de stabilisation optique, Bague de mise au point manuelle, Pas de conception tous temps, Léger manque d'homogénéité aux plus grandes ouvertures, Piqué génral à f/1,4 en retrait
  • Le Canon EF 50 mm f/1,4 USM est un bon objectif mais il n'est pas parfait. Optiquement, on peut lui reprocher un léger manque d'homogénéité aux plus grandes ouvertures et un piqué général en retrait à f/1,4. Sur ce point, on passe l'éponge. Il est cependa...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-04-16, review by: colorfoto.de

  • Abstract:  Das 50-mm-Objektiv gilt als die klassische Normalbrennweite, weil sein Bildwinkel an einer Kleinbildkamera dem des menschlichen Gesichtsfelds gut entspricht....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 4 « Previous   1 2 3 4   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×