Testseek.com have collected 156 expert reviews of the Crucial / Micron 2.5 inch RealSSD M4 C400 Series SATA600 and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Crucial / Micron 2.5 inch RealSSD M4 C400 Series SATA600.
May 2011
(85%)
156 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(83%)
2164 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
850100156
Reviews
page 3 of 16
Order by:
Score
Published: 2013-01-14, Author: Sebastian , review by: purepc.pl
Po przejrzeniu ponad trzydziestu wykresów nie każdy będzie w stanie wyciągnąć odpowiednie wnioski, zwłaszcza jeśli nie spojrzymy na wyniki dysków SSD przez pryzmat ceny. Ostatecznie to właśnie stosunek kwoty zakupu do oferowanych możliwości będzie głównym...
Published: 2013-01-06, Author: Andrew , review by: tomshardware.com
Abstract: The first mSATA-based SSDs we reviewed wowed us with diminutive dimensions, but not as much with performance. Today's best efforts are a lot more like their desktop equivalents, though. We round up 10 models between 64 and 256 GB and nail down a winner. ...
Consistently fast performance on all of our benchmarks, Doesn't lag far behind pricier drives, Also available in 7mm versions for thin laptops
Accessories and software cost extra, Pricey compared to several other performance-grade drives, which were faster on some benchmark tests
On our benchmarks, Crucial's M4 drive was appreciably speedy, without ever breaking new ground. If you're looking for well-rounded performance, it's a solid choice, but a bit pricey. ...
Too much choice in the SSD segment has made selecting the perfect SSD for a gaming PC or notebook upgrade a rather daunting and at times Excel-spreadsheet-worthy task. It shouldn't have to be like this. As we've seen in PCSTATS' benchmarks today, Crucial'...
As is often the case with SSD reviews, what we have here is a mixed bag of results, so now it’s time to sift through them to try and better understand where each SSD stands in terms of performance. Breaking down the file copy tests, if we combine the ...
As is often the case with SSD reviews, what we have here is a mixed bag of results, so now it’s time to sift through them to try and better understand where each SSD stands in terms of performance. Breaking down the file copy tests, if we combine the ...
Abstract: We are usually not very thrilled about reviewing SSDs with 120 or 128 gigabytes storage capacity. This capacity is just not good for showing what a particular SSD design can do. Today’s SSDs use eight-channel controllers and 64-gigabit flash memory chi...
Abstract: A tout seigneur, tout honneur ! Après avoir passé au crible de 58 tests tirés de 6 benchmarks différents, nous vous proposons ce comparatif un peu revisité. D'accès plus simple et plus clair (du moins l'espérons nous) grâce à un nouveau tableau de syn...
Great sequential read/write performance, Excellent incompressible data performance, Tiny form factor, Up to a 256GB capacity, Price
Lower than Standard M4 SATA random read/write performance, Overall, I found the Crucial m4 mSATA SSD to be very impressive. You get close to the performance of the full-size m4 but in a significantly smaller package. The sequential read/write performance
The Crucial M4 64GB is arranged with only one NAND chip connected to each of the eight channels provided by its Marvell controller, preventing each channel from reaching its full write potential. The obvious alternative to this strategy is to use only...
