my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Crucial / Micron 2.5 inch RealSSD M4 C400 Series SATA600



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Crucial / Micron 2.5 inch RealSSD M4 C400 Series SATA600

Testseek.com have collected 156 expert reviews of the Crucial / Micron 2.5 inch RealSSD M4 C400 Series SATA600 and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Crucial / Micron 2.5 inch RealSSD M4 C400 Series SATA600.
Award: Good Buy May 2011
May 2011
 
(85%)
156 Reviews
Users
(83%)
2164 Reviews
85 0 100 156

 

Reviews

page 7 of 16
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-02-01, Author: Geoff , review by: Techreport.com

  • Abstract:  Let's be honest. In the PC world, size matters. This is true not only for the height of ATX towers, but also for the thickness of ultrabooks. The size of one's SSD is important, too. In addition to defining how many applications, games, and data can enjoy...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-02-01, Author: Kevin , review by: storagereview.com

  • Read speeds just under 900MB/s in RAID0, Random 4K read speeds topping 90,000 IOPS, Very strong incompressible write speeds
  • Weak-mixed workload performance still carries over from the 0009 firmware
  • For enthusiasts looking to squeeze out even more performance from reliable SSD like the Marvell-powered Crucial m4, going to RAID0 can make sense where you need substantially higher read and write speeds...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-02-01, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Are you mulling the potential benefit of an SSD upgrade on a system without 6 Gb/s SATA connectivity? We run the benchmarks on several different solid-state storage architectures in order to determine how much performance you give up on an older machin...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-01-24, Author: Sebastian , review by: purepc.pl

  • Wybór najlepszego dysku SSD spośród dziesiątków modeli dostępnych na rynku nie należy do najłatwiejszych zadań, ale mamy szczerą nadzieję, że niniejsza publikacja pozwoli Wam podjąć słuszną decyzję. Blisko trzydzieści zaprezentowanych nośników w rozmiarac...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2012-01-19, review by: hardwareunboxed.com

  • The great thing about revisiting the Crucial m4 is that we now have a great deal of experience with these drives. When I first looked at the m4 back in May of 2011 some 9 months ago a lot was unknown about the product, most importantly reliability. It ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2012-01-11, Author: wingphoenix , review by: xfastest.com

  • Abstract:  新一代的Sandy Bridge筆電已經佔據整個筆電市場的主流,也表示採用HM65的晶片組的筆電產品也越來越多,新一代的HM65晶片所提供的SATA 6Gb/s,讓系統的整體傳輸效能又能向上躍升不少,也因固態碟(SSD)存取效能性能極佳,也隨著市場接受度越來越高,廠商不斷的研發新控制晶片及利用SSD體積較為迷你的先天優勢,其效能表現絕不容小覷,固態碟以本身特性而言要取得市場的使用壽命信心,仍有待科技的演進來改善,這塊市場應該是傳統硬碟仍能在個人電腦中占有一席之地的主因,不過加入快取設計及...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-21, review by: guru3d.com

  • It's great to finally be able to include the Crucial M4 series into our benchmark results suite as Crucial did not make the SSD available for a lot of the EU press for a long time. The end results are as expected, this Marvell 88SS9174 based solution is d...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-12-21, review by: Bjorn3d.com

  • SATA 6Gbps, $40 cheaper than similarly performance SSDs, Good price to performance ratio, 3 year warranty
  • Not as fast as SandForce drives
  • The performance of the m4 is rather interesting. The drive's random write speed is able to compete against SandForce drives but its random read speed falls behind the competitor. Its sequential read is faster and competitive yet the sequential write i...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(85%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-14, review by: hardwarelabs.de

  • fällt uns in diesem Test allerdings schwer, so dass wir gerne beide SSDs empfehlen möchten. Wer also auf das Zubehör der HyperX verzichten und eine etwas geringere Performance in Kauf nehmen kann, sollte zur Crucial m4 256 GB greifen. Die SSD ist derz...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-13, review by: tweaktown.com

  • Looking through the benchmarks, at times our setups do become a bit wobbly, especially the older C300 one. For the most part, though, we can see performance is extremely strong on the new m4 setup with some of the best gains being shown under HD Tune...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 7 of 16 « Previous   1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 16   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×