Testseek.com have collected 22 expert reviews of the D-Link DIR-635 RangeBooster N 650 Router and the average rating is 69%. Scroll down and see all reviews for D-Link DIR-635 RangeBooster N 650 Router.
(69%)
22 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
69010022
Reviews
page 1 of 3
Order by:
Score
Published: 2009-11-03, Author: Martin , review by: svethardware.cz
Abstract: V minulé recenzi modelu jsme se zmiňovali o jeho jednoduchosti a minimálním řešení, které poskytuje vše potřebné pro vybudování sítě, ale tím to také končí. Dnes se vrhneme trochu dále a probereme detailně dalšího zástupce v našem testu od společnost...
Abstract: Ein Datendurchsatz von 63 MBit pro Sekunde im n-Draft-Standard: das ist nicht besonders berühmt, wenn Sie an die von den Herstellern versprochenen 300 MBit/s Datenrate denken. Immerhin: im g-Standard lieferte der D-Link im Test gute Ergebnisse. Etwa 25...
Abstract: The RangeBooster N650 is an IEEE 802.11n (draft) compliant wireless router thats meant for small offices and homes. Along with this router, we also received a PCI as well as PC-card adapter. Interestingly, the PCI card also had 3 antennae, something ...
Abstract: A feature-packed router with good coverage and speed, and all at a reasonable price. Considering its compact dimensions, the D-Link boasts a surprising number of features. It may not have an ADSL modem built in, but the four network ports at the re...
Abstract: In a recent feature, we had spoken about emerging wireless technologies with a specific reference to 802.11n and the performance leap it promises to deliver. D-Link which enjoys considerable popularity in India, has now made its 802.11n products availa...
802.11n speed, Ability to capture syslog data, excellent port forwarding setups
802.11n is still "Draft", No Gigabit switch, Unable to access administrator console using Jumbo frames >4000 bytes
The specification for 802.11n is without a doubt better than its predecessors, b and g. The dilemma is just how much better. Since 802.11n is still a "draft" specification, we can not definitively put our stamp of approval on it. Interoperability issue...
