my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Intel Core i9 7960X 2.8GHz Socket 2066



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i9 7960X 2.8GHz Socket 2066

Testseek.com have collected 79 expert reviews of the Intel Core i9 7960X 2.8GHz Socket 2066 and the average rating is 81%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i9 7960X 2.8GHz Socket 2066.
Award: Most Awarded December 2017
December 2017
 
(81%)
79 Reviews
Users
(83%)
143 Reviews
81 0 100 79

 

Reviews

page 6 of 8
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Intel unabashedly aims its high-end desktop CPUs at those seeking the ultimate in performance, and from our first round of testing, it's apparent that Core i9-7960X delivers this across a range of heavily threaded workloads like rendering, encoding, and f...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: Mark , review by: arstechnica.com

  • The fastest slice of silicon going, Good gaming performance, Improved memory support, Modern complement of I/O
  • Not that much faster than Threadripper 1950X, Fewer PCIe lanes than the competition, Power hungry, Continual use of TIM instead of solder, High clock speeds and quiet systems out of the question without custom liquid cooling or delidding
  • That Intel finds itself in a place where its flagship processors just barely scrape past the competition is an astonishing turn of events. It might well continue to offer the best gaming performance in the mainstream, where gaming continues to be the key...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: Michael , review by: phoronix.com

  • The results basically speak for themselves. If you would like to compare your own system(s) Linux performance against the results found in this article, simply install the Phoronix Test Suite and run phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1709241-TY-INTELCORE86...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: Jarred , review by: pcgamer.com

  • Nearly as fast as the i9
  • Diminishing returns as price increases, Overclocking needs a serious PSU and HSF, The i78700K is a far more sensible gaming CPU
  • The i9-7960X is extremely potent, but the price and power are tough pills to swallow...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: Guillaume , review by: hardware.fr

  • Abstract:  Après une première vague de modèles lancés fin juin, c'est aujourd'hui la seconde vague de Skylake-X qui sont lancés aujourd'hui par Intel, qui pousse le nombre de coeurs maximal à 18! Un sacré bond en avant quand l'on considère qu'il a fallu attendre...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: Koen , review by: hardware.info

  • ConclusieBepaald niet onverwacht, maar Intel gaat weer fier aan kop in de meeste multi-threaded CPU-benchmarks. Dat kan ook niet anders: de Core i9 7980XE heeft met 18-cores twee rekenkernen meer dan AMD's topmodel Threadripper 1950X en daarnaast zijn vri...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: Gordon , review by: pcworld.com_techhive.com

  • Abstract:  Intel. Strikes. Back. The massive 18-core Core i9-7980X and 16-core Core i8-7960X are the chipmaker's response to AMD's Ryzen Threadripper, which has been eating Intel's lunch for many months.But can Goliath Intel rise from its stunning defeat to challeng...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: Matt , review by: computershopper.com

  • Similar performance, in many relevant instances, to Intel's pricier 18-core chip, Compatible Core X-Series motherboards start at lower prices than boards for AMD's Threadripper
  • $700 pricier than AMD's competing 16-core counterpart
  • Intel's 16-core Core i9 chip hews close to its pricier 18-core Core i9 Extreme Edition counterpart. It's a powerful chip, no denying, but AMD's competing Threadripper 1950X, at many hundreds of bucks less, is strong competition. Read More...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, review by: hardwareluxx.ru

  • Очень высокая производительность в многопоточных приложениях, Высокий уровень производительности даже в приложениях, не оптимизированных под многопоточность, Приемлемое энергопотребление под нагрузкой, Отличный уровень энергопотребления в режиме бездейств
  • Очень высокая цена, Проблематичный разгон изза большого числа ядер

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: Gordon , review by: pcworld.com_techhive.com

  • Abstract:  Intel. Strikes. Back. The massive 18-core Core i9-7980X and 16-core Core i8-7960X are the chipmaker's response to AMD's Ryzen Threadripper, which has been eating Intel's lunch for many months.But can Goliath Intel rise from its stunning defeat to challeng...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 6 of 8 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×