my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Intel Core i9 7960X 2.8GHz Socket 2066



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i9 7960X 2.8GHz Socket 2066

Testseek.com have collected 79 expert reviews of the Intel Core i9 7960X 2.8GHz Socket 2066 and the average rating is 81%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i9 7960X 2.8GHz Socket 2066.
Award: Most Awarded December 2017
December 2017
 
(81%)
79 Reviews
Users
(83%)
143 Reviews
81 0 100 79

 

Reviews

page 7 of 8
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, review by: proclockers.com

  • We had a blast testing these monster CPU's out. Every single benchmark we ran was just crushed, and every single chart we have had to be expanded by nearly double to accommodate the multi-threaded scores. We had a few testing programs not know quite what...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, review by: hardwarecanucks.com

  • So that wraps everything up for Skylake X and let me tell you this is going to be a hard one to wrap up. The reason for that should be pretty much self-evident: everyone wants the underdog to win and that means you were hoping for Threadripper to gain the...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: garfi3ld , review by: lanoc.org

  • Well one thing is for sure, you can't call the new addition to the Core-X lineup slow. While I was only able to test two of the four new CPUs. Both were very impressive in just about every test I ran. It was especially impressive in the tests that are...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: Iván , review by: noticias3d.com

  • Cabría esperar un rendimiento bestial en comparación, incluso, con el top que teníamos antes, el 7900X. Pero no es así del todo. Si bien en rendimiento sintético el 7890XE le pasa la mano por la cara a los demás, no es así ni en todos los casos ni en todo...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: Dennis , review by: hardwareluxx.de

  • sehr hohe Performance in Multithreading-Anwendungen, hohe Performance auch bei Anwendungen mit geringem Multithreading, akzeptabler Stromverbrauch unter Last, guter Stromverbrauch unter Idle-Bedingungen
  • sehr hoher Kaufpreis, Overclocking aufgrund der Kernanzahl schwierig, Für einen richtigen Core i9-7980XE-Rechner muss man tief in die Tasche greifen, aber nicht nur bezüglich der CPU, sondern auch in sämtlichen anderen Belangen: Das Board muss entsprechen
  • Ziel erreicht: Da, wo Threadripper vorne stand, steht jetzt meistens wieder ein Intel-Prozessor an der Spitze. Der hat es natürlich ebenso wie Threadripper in sich, schneller konnte man Videos, Effekte, Musik oder andere Workloads auf einem Desktop-Rechne...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Fastest overall workstation performance available, especially for compression
  • Terrible value compared to AMD's Threadripper chips. No ECC memory support
  • As usual we have quite a bit of data to sort through. Of course, it's not just about delivering the best performance and instead most people are interested in bang for their buck.First up we have Blender, this is a lower is better scenario which is why th...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: ccokeman , review by: overclockersclub.com

  • High core count, Overclocking, Multi-threaded performance
  • Low base frequency, High price for performance, High heat when overclocked
  • With these two processors, we get some good and some not so good performance characteristics. On one hand, in just about every test the Core i9 7980XE and Core i9 7960X are the cream of the crop when it comes to pure processing power. On the other hand, I...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: Ryan , review by: pcper.com

  • But as I stated at the outset of this review, while performance per dollar is the king of metrics for consumers in the mainstream space, for HEDT and workstation users, sometimes expense is no object, within reason. For those types of buyers, the 18-core...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: Marco , review by: hothardware.com

  • Killer Multi-Threaded Performance, Good Power Consumption, Insane Performance When Overclocked, Better Single-Thread Performance Then Ryzen
  • Extremely Expensive, Some Anomalous Benchmark Results
  • Intel Core i9-7980XE And Core i9-7960X Processors -- Find Them At AmazonWe can't wrap up this article without referencing AMD's impressive Threadripper processors. Whether it's publicly acknowledged or not, the stealthy nature of Threadripper's developmen...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-09-25, Author: barry , review by: expreview.com

  • Abstract:  对于DIY玩家来说这一年的PC界可算是异常的热闹,除了AMD推出主流的AM4和高端的TR4平台之外,Intel这边也不甘示弱,也及时的发布了自己的最高端的i9系列处理器,不过发布归发布,但是在我们看来有点像是匆忙应付AMD而推出的产品,直到现在12核以上的处理器还没有开卖。除此之外在主流平台这边也有着第八代酷睿处理器的出现,这一代的处理器总算没有挤牙膏了。虽然之前说是10月5号才发布,不过在今天中午时突然就发布了。眼看着小弟出现公然飙车的违法行为,作为大哥的i9自然也不能落后,现在外媒 PCPER 也给我...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 7 of 8 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×