my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Nikon AF-S VR 300mm f/4E PF ED Nikkor



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Nikon AF-S VR 300mm f/4E PF ED Nikkor

Testseek.com have collected 13 expert reviews of the Nikon AF-S VR 300mm f/4E PF ED Nikkor and the average rating is 81%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Nikon AF-S VR 300mm f/4E PF ED Nikkor.
 
(81%)
13 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
81 0 100 13

 

Reviews

page 1 of 2
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2015-11-05, Author: Stan , review by: shutterbug.com

  • To me, Nikon's new Nikkor 300mm f/4E PF ED VR is the perfect storm of everything in modern optics coming together. The quality is there as is the innovation with the Fresnel lens and the lens is sharp. Really sharp! However, in all cases, the overall shar...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-10-05, review by: Slrgear.com

  • It's nice to see innovation hard at work, and the resulting reduction in size and weight is welcome for users who were tired of lugging around the 3+ lbs. 300mm ƒ/4 AF-S. If there are any shortcomings with the new PF version, it is that it is not capable...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-10-03, review by: practicalphotography.com

  • The Nikon 300mm f/4 is an impressive lens that breaks the mould of prime telephoto lenses. The main let down is the lack of full weather-sealing. However, image quality is very good, but what really makes it so special is the incredible reduction in size...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-07-10, Author: Jim , review by: pcmag.com

  • Lightweight design. Sharp from edge to edge. Optically stabilized. 1:4 magnification.
  • Pricey. Not compatible with some older cameras
  • The Nikon AF-S Nikkor 300mm f/4E PF ED VR is a light and compact telephoto prime lens, but you pay a premium for its size...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-04-30, Author: Arthur , review by: focus-numerique.fr

  • Taille et poids, Qualité optique, Homogénéité des images, Performance de la stabilisation optique
  • Piqué légèrement en retrait à f/4, Vignetage imposant à f/4, Bague de mise au point un peu bruyante
  • Impossible de ne pas recommander cette optique! Elle a tout d'une grande dans un format compact. La qualité optique est remarquable malgré un peu de vignetage et un léger piqué en retrait à la plus grande ouverture f/4. La prise en main est réellement su...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-03-31, review by: digitalfoto.dk

  • Abstract:  Nikons nye teleobjektiv på 300 mm og blænde F4.0 er 700 gram lettere og syv cm kortere end den gamle tele med samme brændvidde. Det kan lade sig gøre på grund af Nikons første Phase Fresnel-linse, hos Canon kaldet DO, som bryder lyset ......

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(84%)
 
  Published: 2015-03-31, review by: digitalfotoforalla.se

  • Abstract:  Nikons nya teleobjektiv på 300 mm och bländare F4.0 är 700 gram lättare och 7 cm kortare än det gamla telet med samma brännvidd. Det är möjligt tack vare Nikons första Phase Fresnel-lins, hos Canon kallad DO, som bryter ljuset annorlunda än ......

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(84%)
 
  Published: 2015-03-31, Author: Cees , review by: zoom.nl

  • beeldkwaliteit, goede VR, compact en licht, stille en snelle AF
  • kans op ringvormige flare bij extreme lichtbronnen

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(79%)
 
  Published: 2015-03-20, Author: Przemysław , review by: fotografuj.pl

  • Abstract:  Nowy NIKKOR 300 mm f/4E PF ED VR to konstrukcja o tyle ciekawa, że jak na teleobiektyw o tak długiej ogniskowej i jasności f/4 jest stosunkowo niewielki (średnica: 89 mm, długość: 147,5 mm) i lekki (755 g). Redukcja ciężaru i rozmiarów była możliwa dzięki...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-03-13, review by: lenstip.com

  • excellent image quality in the frame centre, good resolution on the edge of the frame no matter what sensor you use, proper correction of longitudinal and lateral chromatic aberration, lack of problems with spherical aberration, moderate distortion, negli
  • average performance against bright light, price.
  • If you compare the lists of pros and cons you can answer a question concerning the advantages of using new technologies without hesitation. A classic lens – made of ordinary elements – perhaps would have higher resolution results and would fare against br...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 2 « Previous   1 2   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×