my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 348 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice April 2017
April 2017
 
(88%)
348 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
88 0 100 348

 

Reviews

page 32 of 35
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Strike , review by: expreview.com

  • Abstract:  全新的Zen架构让消费者重新认识了AMD的处理器,再也不是以前那种性能弱小的产品,首批上市的Ryzen 7是目前性价比最好的八核处理器,受到了玩家大量的好评,市场的反应也相当火,三款产品卖得都相当好,然而它们毕竟都是高端产品价格最低的Ryzen 7 1700也得2499元,对Intel的刺激有限,然而今天发布的Ryzen 5系列处理器影响就大了,售价从1299元到1999元,正好覆盖顶级Core i3与Core i5全系列的价格范围。AMD Ryzen 5处理器在今天4月11日全球发售,该系列产品有四款包...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: 上方文Q , review by: mydrivers.com

  • 很多人都吐槽Intel这几年频频“挤牙膏”,事实也就是这么无奈,一方面是行业形势变化,PC不再是Intel公司的业务重点,另一方面就是缺乏竞争,没人在后边狂追谁会一路飞奔?幸运的是,打不死的小强AMD又回来了,多年心血之作Zen架构几乎超出所有人预料,无论性能、功耗、价格还是生态环境支持,几乎都无可挑剔,给高端市场带来了久违的激情。锐龙一登场,大家在为AMD欢呼的同时,也都期盼着两家芯片巨头能迅速展开“肉搏战”,带来更优秀、更便宜的产品。不过很奇怪,尽管锐龙7系列表现出色,冲击力很强,但是Intel方面却...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: nApoleon , review by: chiphell.com

  • 依靠着AMD Zen架构的可灵活配置的特点.拥有当下更接近主流的六核心与四核心的Ryzen 5也得以迅速地来到我们面前.对照之前的拥有两组完整四核CCX的Ryzen 7,依靠屏蔽不同数目核心但仍有相近运行频率的Ryzen 5 1600X和1500X的性能表现特征以及变化也显得很有规律性.而在过去的某霸权厂商常年将主流性能级产品规格压制在8线程级别的巨大惯性之下, 对于还不想”战未来”的用户而言,相信维持在同等规格的四核版Ryzen 5以及已经领先半步的六核版Ryzen 5在接下来较长的时间里仍然会拥有较强...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, review by: tomshw.it

  • Ryzen 5 1600X offre gran parte delle stesse caratteristiche e capacità viste con i Ryzen 7, eccetto per il prezzo più basso. Non è qualcosa che sorprende dato che il die è lo stesso, ma con un paio di core disattivati. Anche se il consumo in idle del proc...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Paolo , review by: hwupgrade.it

  • Con il debutto commerciale dei processori della famiglia Ryzen 5, disponibili in vendita da quest'oggi, AMD completa la propria gamma di nuovi processori per sistemi desktop rimarcando ulteriormente quali siano le peculiarità della propria offerta. Quelli...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Daniele , review by: everyeye.it

  • L'ambito di impiego a cui questo 1600X va a rivolgersi non è ben delineato, e va ricercato piuttosto in un mix fra utilizzo workstation e gaming: il processore va abbastanza forte in entrambi gli scenari (pur considerando la non-ottimizzazione della strag...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(92%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Koen , review by: hardware.info

  • De Ryzen 5-processors hebben twee gezichten. Aan de ene kant zijn ze vaak net zo snel of zelfs sneller dan de Core i7 7700K in workloads die geschikt zijn om te werken op meerdere cores - en vergeet daarbij niet dat die i7 100 euro duurder is. Voor zake...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, review by: tweakers.net

  • Flinke inhaalslag wat betreft per-core prestaties; AMD schiet daar van matig naar zeer goed, 6 Cores / 12 Thread, en echte cores etcetera, Game prestaties concurrerend, Aggressieve prijsstelling is leuk voor de koper, AM4 platform brengt AMD ook wat moder
  • Kaby Lake single-core performance (ipc gecombineerd met hogere standaard snelheden) ligt nog wat hoger, Nog vroeg in de Ryzen lifecycle, er valt nog te optimaliseren, en AMD had zaken zoals geheugencompatibiliteit en bios-zaken richting fabrikanten m.i. b
  • AMD staat inmiddels bekend om een aantal zaken. Één als de CPU fabrikant die weer echt mee doet met hun Ryzen processoren, en twee als de club die fanatieke reviewers graag van hun schoonheidsslaapje houdt door net voor de release met hele toffe maar...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, review by: ixbt.com

  • Потенциально Ryzen 5 1600X может оказаться примерно на четверть медленнее, чем Ryzen 7 1800X, что прямо вытекает из ТТХ процессоров: отличаются они лишь количеством активных ядер. В действительности же далеко не все программы способны задействовать даже 1...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-11, Author: Илья , review by: 3dnews.ru

  • Предложение AMD для среднего ценового сегмента, которое инженеры этой компании сконструировали на базе дизайна Summit Ridge, приятно удивляет. Как показывает проведённый анализ, рассмотренный нами процессор Ryzen 5 1600X обладает отличным для своей цены у...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 32 of 35 « Previous   1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×