my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD FX-4100 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-4100 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 49 expert reviews of the AMD FX-4100 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 69%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-4100 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
 
(69%)
49 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
69 0 100 49

 

Reviews

page 4 of 5
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-02-10, review by: presence-pc.com

  • Abstract:  Lorsque le marché des processeurs se renouvelle, il nous tient à cœur de réunir les modèles les plus abordables pour évaluer leurs performances ludiques. Le dernier article en ce sens remonte à un peu moins d’un an et le moins que l’on puisse dire, c’...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-01-25, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • Abstract:  This time we'd like to offer you the summarized test results of as many as 71 processors. This generally marks the end of the year, not the end of another test method's life cycle (like the last time). We believe this summary contains all important pro...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-01-20, Author: Techno , review by: technolabs.net

  • AMD FX 4100, işlemciye çok fazla para vermeden, ortalama seviyede bir performans almak isteyenlere kesinlikle tavsiye edeceğimiz bir işlemci olmuş. Puan:7/10 Fiyat: 280 TL...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-31, Author: redakcja , review by: benchmark.pl

  • Abstract:  AMD FX-4100 3.6GHz socket AM3+ benchmarks...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-15, review by: xbitlabs.com

  • Two months ago when we tested the top desktop Bulldozer processor, we concluded that it turned out a big disappointment. The results of our today’s FX series testing, including lower-cost CPU modifications, didn’t change out opinion. Processors on Bul...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-12, Author: Gavric , review by: fcenter.ru

  • Два месяца назад, проведя подробное тестирование старшего Bulldozer для настольных компьютеров, мы посчитали его большим разочарованием. Новое тестирование CPU серии FX, в которое были вовлечены более дешёвые их модификации, наше мнение изменить не смогло...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-01, Author: Jeremy , review by: techradar.com/au/

  • Cutting edge AMD architecture on the cheap, You might be able to unlock the extra modules
  • Weak percore performance, Not a great gaming chip

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-01, review by: techradar.com

  • Cutting edge AMD architecture on the cheap, You might be able to unlock the extra modules
  • Weak per-core performance, Not a great gaming chip
  • Cut down versions of a top chip usually make a lot of sense. This time, not so much...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-11-22, Author: Marc , review by: pcgameshardware.de

  • Abstract:  The Elder Scrolls 5 Skyrim im CPU-Test: Die Creation-Engine bildet das Basisgerüst für das Rollenspiel-Epos, aber wie gut skaliert diese mit der CPU-Leistung? PC Games Hardware testet 20 Prozessoren nahe der ersten großen Stadt Weißlauf in der Provinz Him...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-19, Author: beerking , review by: vmodtech.com

  • เอาละครับมาถึงช่วงท้ายเกม เจอราจก็ยังเจ็บอยู่ยังไม่ได้ลง อลอนโซก็ย้ายไปอยู่มาดริดแล้ว ตอเรทก็ไม่อยู่ ไม่เป็นไรเคิ๊กเคา คนเดียวก็หล่อแล้น  อ้าวผิดเรื่องอีกแล้ว มาถึงส่งท้ายกันแล้วละครับ ซื้อตัวเลยเบนเซม่าอะ  นั้นกลับมา อิอิ ขออภัยครับติดพันไปนิดนึงครับสำหร...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 4 of 5 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×