my.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD FX-4100 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-4100 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 49 expert reviews of the AMD FX-4100 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 69%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-4100 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
 
(69%)
49 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
69 0 100 49

 

Reviews

page 5 of 5
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-11-08, Author: Nathan , review by: legitreviews.com

  • The AMD FX-4100 didn't top the charts when it comes to CPU performance, but the low price and solid overclocking results make it a decent chip for those looking for a budget system build....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-07, Author: Carl , review by: HardCOREware.net

  • Due to issues with customs/logistics (no fault of AMD's), we're a bit late with our Bulldozer review. I suppose that is fitting in this case, but luckily, this gives us the chance to take a bit more time with the review, testing the Bulldozer CPU under it...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-07, Author: Alva , review by: jagatreview.com

  • Seperti perkiraan kami, performa prosesor ini dalam keadaan default kurang mengesankan. Performa AMD FX-4100 dalam beberapa tes benchmark sintetik yang kami lakukan ini sedikit di bawah Intel Core i3-2100. Untungnya AMD FX-4100 ini memiliki headroom overc...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-01, review by: hardwareluxx.de

  • Abstract:  Nach dem ersten Test des AMD FX-8150 (Hardwareluxx-Artikel) hatten wir nun auch die Gelegenheit zwei weitere Bulldozer-Prozessoren ausführlich zu testen. Unser Dank geht an dieser Stelle an Alternate, die uns mit den beiden Samples ausstatten konnten, ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-19, review by: phoronix.com

  • Abstract:  The NAS Parallel Benchmarks from NASA were mixed, but generally the i3-2120 managed to outperform the FX-4100. CLOMP is used for measuring the OpenMP efficiency on multiple CPU cores. The FX-4100 did quite poorly for being a quad-core part and ev...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-14, Author: Slayer , review by: u-sm.ru

  • Abstract:  Не ждали? Но они снова здесь. Кто?

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, Author: Hilbert , review by: guru3d.com

  • Abstract:  AMD FX 8150 - 8120 - 6100 and 4100 performance reviewYesterday AMD released the FX series Zambezi - Bulldozer based processor. Everybody has been focusing on that most high-end AMD FX 8150 processor. However there where three other processors released.Thi...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Het was augustus 2007 toen we op Hardware.Info voor het eerst publiceerden over AMD's plannen om een nieuwe processorontwerp met codenaam Bulldozer te introduceren. Destijds was het de bedoeling om de Bulldozer-architectuur al in 2009 op de markt te br...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-06-01, Author: Jan , review by: svethardware.cz

  • Abstract:  Na Bulldozery čekali příznivci společnosti AMD dlouhé roky a od příchodů procesorů Intel Core doufali, že se jim podaří alespoň dohnat výkonnostní náskok nové architektury Intelu. Dnes už však víme, že to vůbec není tak horké, jak nás ještě nedávno pře...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 5 of 5 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×