Testseek.com have collected 266 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
July 2015
(79%)
266 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Progression de performances, Baisse de la consommation, OC, Prix
Pas toujours au Top, Conso encore importante
Vous allez le voir, la conclusion de cet article est bien difficile à rédiger. Dans un premier temps, nous serions tentés de critiquer ce processeur, car même si les performances sont en hausse, nous restons, de notre point de vue, loin du compte pour ...
L'AMD FX-8350, fer de lance de la nouvelle gamme de processeur FX d'AMD, marque-t-il le retour d'AMD ? Par rapport au lancement du FX-8150, le progrès est net même s'il faut bien avouer que l'inverse aurait été difficile. En termes de performances tout...
Good Performance, Decent Overclocker, Improved Efficiency, Easy Upgrade For Existing AMD Owners
Dated Platform, Intel CPUs Still Clearly Faster
Even before AMD officially released its Bulldozer-based FX-Series of desktop processors last year, the company was already talking about the follow-on microarchitecture codenamed “Piledriver”. In fact, in the conclusion of our launch article featuring the...
Architettura Piledriver a 8 Core (4 Moduli attivi), Buon incremento prestazionale rispetto a Bulldozer, Moltiplicatore completamente sbloccato, Ottima predisposizione all’overclock, Nuove istruzioni supportate rispetto a Bulldozer (FMA3, F16C), Tecnologia AMD Turbo Core 3.0, Buone temperature d’esercizio, Consumi più contenuti rispetto a Bulldozer,
Eccoci giunti alla parte sicuramente più impegnativa del nostro articolo, è arrivato il momento di tirare le somme sulla nostra esperienza con il nuovo processore di punta della linea AMD FX, basato su architettura Piledriver, frutto di molti mesi di lavo...
Just over a year on from the original FX launch where does the FX-8350 leave us? Well looking at the build quality first we have a chip which shares the same good level of manufacturing as previous CPUs. These are resilient chips and cope well with plenty...
Подведение итогов проведённого исследования мы начнём неожиданно – с результатов ещё одного бенчмарка, по которым вся ситуация с плюсами и минусами микроархитектуры, которой на данный момент располагает AMD, становится совершенно прозрачной. На приведён...
Abstract: Der letztes Jahr vorgestellte Bulldozer enttäuschte Enthusiasten, die gehofft hatten, AMD würde wieder in die Performance-Spitze aufrücken. Heute bekommt die FX-Familie ein Update auf die Piledriver-Architektur. Haben Power-User Grund zum Feiern? Als H...
Abstract: Last year, AMD launched its Bulldozer architecture to disappointed enthusiasts who were hoping to see the company rise to its former glory. Today, we get an FX processor based on the Piledriver update. Does it give power users something to celebrate? A...
Abstract: From the initial testing of the brand new AMD FX-8350 "Vishera", the performance was admirable, especially compared to last year's bit of a troubled start with the AMD FX Bulldozer processors. For many of the Linux computational benchmarks carried out ...
This year has primarily been about Intel with their success of Ivy Bridge and the Z77 platform, but we mustn't forget about AMD as they still take a chunk of the market that appeals to the budget conscious who want the very best performance, but can't aff...
