Testseek.com have collected 266 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
July 2015
(79%)
266 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Bra prestanda med de flesta applikationer som använder flera trådar, Olåst multipel, Godkända överklockningsresultat, Bra relation mellan pris/prestanda (prisvärd)
Prestandan med en processorkärna är mindre bra, Spelprestandan kunde ha varit bättre, Hög strömförbrukning
När det gäller arkitekturen har AMD gjort förändringar med "Pildriver" men det handlar främst om flera mindre förbättringar av Bulldozer tillsammans med högre frekvenser. Ser vi till prestandan i flertrådade applikationer så klarar sig FX-8350 riktigt b...
Was this review helpful?
Award
-
Published: 2012-10-23, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Abstract: About this time last year, AMD's new Bulldozer-based FX series launched to bright-eyed system builders who expected the new architecture to challenge Intel's increasingly comfortable position in the upper-end processor market. Unfortunately, Bulldozer was...
Conclusion AMD Vishera FX-8350 Black Edition 는..... 테스트 결과, FX-8350(비셰라)은 FX-8150(불도저)과 비교하여,싱글코어 / 멀티코어 약 7~10% 향상된 성능을 보여주었으며, 7~10%의 소비전력은 감소된 결과를 보였습니다. 오버클럭폭 자체는 불도저에 비해 크게 나아졌다고 볼 수 없으나 높아진 IPC,낮아진 전력소모, 출시예정가격이 23만원대로 기본 상태(Default)에서 INTE...
지금까지 살펴본 결과를 토대로, 우선 "FX-8350"이란 모델 자체의 포지션을 분석해 보겠습니다.8350은 8150의 자리를 대체할 것이 확실시되는데, 과연 8150 대비 기본 스펙상의 성능은 얼마나 올랐을까요? ...별도의 설명이 필요한가요? :-)(죄송, 밤새 테스트를 한 끝이라 언어 감각이 실종되고 있습니다 -_-;)...FX-8350이라는 '모델' 자체의 성능과 별개의 문제로, 파일드라이버 아키텍처의 경쟁력은 과연 어떠할까요?'스펙상 기본 클...
Po všech těch shrnujících grafech jako obvykle ještě jeden pořádně zavádějící (nejsou započítány výsledky z kapitol Teoretické testy, Rychlost pamětí a PCMark 7):Podělíme-li celkový (průměrný) výkon procesorů jejich cenou, vypadne nám takovýto „index výho...
Published: 2012-10-23, Author: White , review by: modlabs.net
По итогам знакомства с флагманом линейки процессоров Vishera , можно сказать, что мы получили хорошо доработанный процессор Bulldozer. Согласитесь, номинальные частоты выросли, а TDP остался прежним, заметно вырос оверклокерский потенциал новинки. Ценовая...
teils deutlich langsamer als günstigere Ivy-Bridge-Vierkerner
Florian Klein: Wer darauf gehofft hat, dass AMD mit Piledriver ein ähnlicher Leistungssprung gelingt wie mit dem konkurrenzfähigen Phenom II im Vergleich zum ziemlich miesen Phenom I, wird enttäuscht. Zwar zeigt der AMD FX 8350 bei den konsequent parallel...
Published: 2012-10-22, Author: Dan , review by: legitreviews.com
The AMD FX-8350 has a number of strong points that make it a great choice for your computer. If you're looking to upgrade from an older system you really can't beat the price to performance ratio offered with an eight core 4GHz processor processor fo...
Excellent affordability versus computing power, Low platform price, NEW Piledriver CPU core design, Improved "Per Clock" performance, Compatible with existing AM3+ products
Same maximum TDP as previous products, Perhaps a bit late to the market. It still uses 32nm while Intel is on 22nm, Higher power consumption than Intel products, "Low" but adequate single-threaded performance will not appeal to some
What can I say? AMD has priced these new FX-8350 CPUs in such a way that there is no doubt: they make an attractive alternative to their Intel counterparts, and AMD seems focused on keeping that price difference no matter what. AMD can't take Intel ove...
